Hi David,
On Mon, 5 Jun 2017 13:43:06 +0200 David Sterba wrote:
>
> Now fixed, sorry. Top commit 736202ae51c50a6063087011073e91b6a6ae92e9. I
> didn't notice the patch got back to for-next through another branch.
Ah ha. Thanks.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
On Mon, Jun 05, 2017 at 01:30:23PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> On Wed, 31 May 2017 16:58:48 +0200 David Sterba wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 02:29:20AM -0700, Omar Sandoval wrote:
> > > diff --git a/fs/btrfs/free-space-tree.c b/fs/btrfs/free-space-tree.c
> > > index fc
Hi David,
On Wed, 31 May 2017 16:58:48 +0200 David Sterba wrote:
>
> On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 02:29:20AM -0700, Omar Sandoval wrote:
> > diff --git a/fs/btrfs/free-space-tree.c b/fs/btrfs/free-space-tree.c
> > index fc0bd8406758..5abd3cd71144 100644
> > --- a/fs/btrfs/free-space-tree.c
> > +++ b/f
On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 02:29:20AM -0700, Omar Sandoval wrote:
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/free-space-tree.c b/fs/btrfs/free-space-tree.c
> index fc0bd8406758..5abd3cd71144 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/free-space-tree.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/free-space-tree.c
> @@ -153,21 +153,18 @@ static inline u32 free_space_
On Wed 31-05-17 02:29:20, Omar Sandoval wrote:
> On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 11:19:05AM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > On Wed 31-05-17 02:12:02, Omar Sandoval wrote:
> > > On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 08:51:28AM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > > > On Wed 31-05-17 14:30:33, kernel test robot wrote:
> > > > >
On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 11:19:05AM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Wed 31-05-17 02:12:02, Omar Sandoval wrote:
> > On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 08:51:28AM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > > On Wed 31-05-17 14:30:33, kernel test robot wrote:
> > > >
> > > > FYI, we noticed the following commit:
> > > >
>
On Wed 31-05-17 02:12:02, Omar Sandoval wrote:
> On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 08:51:28AM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > On Wed 31-05-17 14:30:33, kernel test robot wrote:
> > >
> > > FYI, we noticed the following commit:
> > >
> > > commit: beeeccca9bebcec386cc31c250cff8a06cf27034 ("btrfs: Use kvzallo
On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 08:51:28AM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Wed 31-05-17 14:30:33, kernel test robot wrote:
> >
> > FYI, we noticed the following commit:
> >
> > commit: beeeccca9bebcec386cc31c250cff8a06cf27034 ("btrfs: Use kvzalloc
> > instead of kzalloc/vmalloc in alloc_bitmap")
> > htt
On Wed 31-05-17 14:30:33, kernel test robot wrote:
>
> FYI, we noticed the following commit:
>
> commit: beeeccca9bebcec386cc31c250cff8a06cf27034 ("btrfs: Use kvzalloc
> instead of kzalloc/vmalloc in alloc_bitmap")
> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git master
I have
FYI, we noticed the following commit:
commit: beeeccca9bebcec386cc31c250cff8a06cf27034 ("btrfs: Use kvzalloc instead
of kzalloc/vmalloc in alloc_bitmap")
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git master
in testcase: boot
on test machine: qemu-system-x86_64 -enable-kvm -c
10 matches
Mail list logo