Re: [lkp-robot] [sched/fair] fbd5188493: WARNING:inconsistent_lock_state

2018-07-05 Thread Dietmar Eggemann
On 07/05/2018 03:24 PM, Matt Fleming wrote: On Thu, 05 Jul, at 11:52:21AM, Dietmar Eggemann wrote: Moving the code from _nohz_idle_balance to nohz_idle_balance let it disappear: diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c index 02be51c9dcc1..070924f07c68 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/fa

Re: [lkp-robot] [sched/fair] fbd5188493: WARNING:inconsistent_lock_state

2018-07-05 Thread Matt Fleming
On Thu, 05 Jul, at 02:24:58PM, Matt Fleming wrote: > > Hmm.. it still looks to me like we should be saving and restoring IRQs > since this can be called from IRQ context, no? > > The patch was a forward-port from one of our SLE kernels, and I messed > up the IRQ flag balancing for the v4.18-rc3 c

Re: [lkp-robot] [sched/fair] fbd5188493: WARNING:inconsistent_lock_state

2018-07-05 Thread Matt Fleming
On Thu, 05 Jul, at 11:52:21AM, Dietmar Eggemann wrote: > > Moving the code from _nohz_idle_balance to nohz_idle_balance let it disappear: > > diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c > index 02be51c9dcc1..070924f07c68 100644 > --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c > +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c >

Re: [lkp-robot] [sched/fair] fbd5188493: WARNING:inconsistent_lock_state

2018-07-05 Thread Dietmar Eggemann
On 07/05/2018 10:58 AM, Dietmar Eggemann wrote: > Hi, > > On 07/05/2018 10:02 AM, kernel test robot wrote: >> >> FYI, we noticed the following commit (built with gcc-7): >> >> commit: fbd51884933192c9cada60628892024495942482 ("[PATCH] sched/fair: Avoid >> divide by zero when rebalancing domains")

Re: [lkp-robot] [sched/fair] fbd5188493: WARNING:inconsistent_lock_state

2018-07-05 Thread Dietmar Eggemann
Hi, On 07/05/2018 10:02 AM, kernel test robot wrote: > > FYI, we noticed the following commit (built with gcc-7): > > commit: fbd51884933192c9cada60628892024495942482 ("[PATCH] sched/fair: Avoid > divide by zero when rebalancing domains") > url: > https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Matt-