On 10/13/2015 02:05 PM, Phil Pokorny wrote:
On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 1:31 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 01:53:32PM +0200, Lukasz Odzioba wrote:
A new limit selected arbitrarily as power of two greater than
required minimum for Xeon Phi processor.
Why 128 instead of a more
On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 1:31 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>
> On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 01:53:32PM +0200, Lukasz Odzioba wrote:
> > A new limit selected arbitrarily as power of two greater than
> > required minimum for Xeon Phi processor.
> Why 128 instead of a more reasonable 64 ? What is the required
2 matches
Mail list logo
