On 6/21/07, Alexey Starikovskiy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
I think you might be interested in following patch, which implements _ACPI_
driver for the same hardware...
It is only "proof of concept" at the moment, but it does main thing -- reads
hwmon device using ACPI interfaces.
Well,
On 6/21/07, Rudolf Marek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ok, it makes sense :)
>
> Name (FBUF, Package (0x06)
> {
> 0x03,
> CPUF,
> CHAF,
> PWRF,
> CHPF,
> CH2F
> })
>
> Clearly the first number is not the number of available readings (though
> it matches the count in the
Hi,
I think you might be interested in following patch, which implements _ACPI_
driver for the same hardware...
It is only "proof of concept" at the moment, but it does main thing -- reads
hwmon device using ACPI interfaces.
Regards,
Alex.
Rudolf Marek wrote:
> Hi again,
>
> Of course it is
Hi again,
Of course it is not there because I removed it myself :/ The "sensors" command
will just produce "general parse error" this is because of the unknown device
class (imho). So I removed that and forgot. Well now I have the sysfs files:
/sys/class/hwmon/hwmon2/device/:
bus
Hello Luca,
Sorry for delay,
Ok, it makes sense :)
Name (FBUF, Package (0x06)
{
0x03,
CPUF,
CHAF,
PWRF,
CHPF,
CH2F
})
Clearly the first number is not the number of available readings (though
it matches the count in the other DSDTs I've seen); don't know what it
is :|
Hello Luca,
Sorry for delay,
Ok, it makes sense :)
Name (FBUF, Package (0x06)
{
0x03,
CPUF,
CHAF,
PWRF,
CHPF,
CH2F
})
Clearly the first number is not the number of available readings (though
it matches the count in the other DSDTs I've seen); don't know what it
is :|
Hi again,
Of course it is not there because I removed it myself :/ The sensors command
will just produce general parse error this is because of the unknown device
class (imho). So I removed that and forgot. Well now I have the sysfs files:
/sys/class/hwmon/hwmon2/device/:
bus
Hi,
I think you might be interested in following patch, which implements _ACPI_
driver for the same hardware...
It is only proof of concept at the moment, but it does main thing -- reads
hwmon device using ACPI interfaces.
Regards,
Alex.
Rudolf Marek wrote:
Hi again,
Of course it is not
On 6/21/07, Rudolf Marek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok, it makes sense :)
Name (FBUF, Package (0x06)
{
0x03,
CPUF,
CHAF,
PWRF,
CHPF,
CH2F
})
Clearly the first number is not the number of available readings (though
it matches the count in the other DSDTs I've
On 6/21/07, Alexey Starikovskiy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I think you might be interested in following patch, which implements _ACPI_
driver for the same hardware...
It is only proof of concept at the moment, but it does main thing -- reads
hwmon device using ACPI interfaces.
Well,
Il Tue, May 22, 2007 at 08:19:27AM +0200, Rudolf Marek ha scritto:
> Hi,
>
> I have following readings:
>
> w83627ehf-isa-0290
> Adapter: ISA adapter
> VCore: +1.52 V (min = +0.00 V, max = +1.74 V)
> in1: +12.30 V (min = +13.46 V, max = +13.04 V) ALARM
> AVCC: +3.36 V (min =
Il Tue, May 22, 2007 at 08:19:27AM +0200, Rudolf Marek ha scritto:
Hi,
I have following readings:
w83627ehf-isa-0290
Adapter: ISA adapter
VCore: +1.52 V (min = +0.00 V, max = +1.74 V)
in1: +12.30 V (min = +13.46 V, max = +13.04 V) ALARM
AVCC: +3.36 V (min = +4.08 V,
Hi,
I have following readings:
w83627ehf-isa-0290
Adapter: ISA adapter
VCore: +1.52 V (min = +0.00 V, max = +1.74 V)
in1: +12.30 V (min = +13.46 V, max = +13.04 V) ALARM
AVCC: +3.36 V (min = +4.08 V, max = +3.95 V) ALARM
3VCC: +3.36 V (min = +4.05 V, max = +3.06 V)
Hi,
I have following readings:
w83627ehf-isa-0290
Adapter: ISA adapter
VCore: +1.52 V (min = +0.00 V, max = +1.74 V)
in1: +12.30 V (min = +13.46 V, max = +13.04 V) ALARM
AVCC: +3.36 V (min = +4.08 V, max = +3.95 V) ALARM
3VCC: +3.36 V (min = +4.05 V, max = +3.06 V)
On 5/21/07, Rudolf Marek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
ATK0110 ATK0110:00: atk_enumerate_fan: invalid fan count 3 (should be 5)
ATK0110: probe of ATK0110:00 failed with error -22
Ok, the FAN package contains 5 items, but the enumerator only
advertises the first 3. I guess that the other 2
Hello all,
Sorry for the delay. Glad that someone took a look into this.
ATK0110 ATK0110:00: atk: adding...
ATK0110 ATK0110:00: board ID = A8VE-SE
ATK0110 ATK0110:00: temp 0: CPU Temperature [900-1250]
ATK0110 ATK0110:00: temp 1: MB Temperature [700-1250]
ATK0110 ATK0110:00: voltage 0: Vcore
Hello all,
Sorry for the delay. Glad that someone took a look into this.
ATK0110 ATK0110:00: atk: adding...
ATK0110 ATK0110:00: board ID = A8VE-SE
ATK0110 ATK0110:00: temp 0: CPU Temperature [900-1250]
ATK0110 ATK0110:00: temp 1: MB Temperature [700-1250]
ATK0110 ATK0110:00: voltage 0: Vcore
On 5/21/07, Rudolf Marek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ATK0110 ATK0110:00: atk_enumerate_fan: invalid fan count 3 (should be 5)
ATK0110: probe of ATK0110:00 failed with error -22
Ok, the FAN package contains 5 items, but the enumerator only
advertises the first 3. I guess that the other 2 (chipset
18 matches
Mail list logo
