On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 03:51:31PM -0500, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> * Paul E. McKenney (paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com) wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 07:50:54AM -0500, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> > > * Mathieu Desnoyers (mathieu.desnoy...@efficios.com) wrote:
> > > > * Paul E. McKenney (paul...@li
* Paul E. McKenney (paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com) wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 07:50:54AM -0500, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> > * Mathieu Desnoyers (mathieu.desnoy...@efficios.com) wrote:
> > > * Paul E. McKenney (paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com) wrote:
> > > > As noted by Konstantin Khlebnikov, gcc can
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 07:50:54AM -0500, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> * Mathieu Desnoyers (mathieu.desnoy...@efficios.com) wrote:
> > * Paul E. McKenney (paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com) wrote:
> > > As noted by Konstantin Khlebnikov, gcc can split assignment of
> > > constants to long variables (https:/
* Mathieu Desnoyers (mathieu.desnoy...@efficios.com) wrote:
> * Paul E. McKenney (paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com) wrote:
> > As noted by Konstantin Khlebnikov, gcc can split assignment of
> > constants to long variables (https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/1/15/141),
> > though assignment of NULL (0) is OK. As
* Paul E. McKenney (paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com) wrote:
> As noted by Konstantin Khlebnikov, gcc can split assignment of
> constants to long variables (https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/1/15/141),
> though assignment of NULL (0) is OK. Assuming that a gcc bug is
> fixed (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attach
5 matches
Mail list logo