Re: [lustre-devel] [PATCH 0/6] dcache/namei fixes for lustre

2017-10-24 Thread NeilBrown
On Tue, Oct 24 2017, James Simmons wrote: >> >> This series is a revised version of two patches I sent >> >> previously (one of which was sadly broken). >> >> That patch has been broken into multiple parts for easy >> >> review. The other is included unchanged as the last of >> >> this series. >>

Re: [lustre-devel] [PATCH 0/6] dcache/namei fixes for lustre

2017-10-24 Thread James Simmons
> >> This series is a revised version of two patches I sent > >> previously (one of which was sadly broken). > >> That patch has been broken into multiple parts for easy > >> review. The other is included unchanged as the last of > >> this series. > >> > >> I was drawn to look at this code due t

Re: [lustre-devel] [PATCH 0/6] dcache/namei fixes for lustre

2017-10-19 Thread NeilBrown
On Sun, Aug 20 2017, James Simmons wrote: >> This series is a revised version of two patches I sent >> previously (one of which was sadly broken). >> That patch has been broken into multiple parts for easy >> review. The other is included unchanged as the last of >> this series. >> >> I was draw

Re: [lustre-devel] [PATCH 0/6] dcache/namei fixes for lustre

2017-08-19 Thread James Simmons
> This series is a revised version of two patches I sent > previously (one of which was sadly broken). > That patch has been broken into multiple parts for easy > review. The other is included unchanged as the last of > this series. > > I was drawn to look at this code due to the tests on > DCAC