On Monday 16 February 2015 12:51:35 Rich Felker wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 06:20:18PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > > Would it really be that hard to do:
> > >
> > > if (ILP32_on_64_process) tv_nsec = (int)tv_nsec;
> > >
> > > or similar? That's all that's needed.
> > >
> > > > In some
On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 06:20:18PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > Would it really be that hard to do:
> >
> > if (ILP32_on_64_process) tv_nsec = (int)tv_nsec;
> >
> > or similar? That's all that's needed.
> >
> > > In some cases, there may also be a measurable performance penalty
> > > in i
On Wednesday 11 February 2015 16:37:58 Rich Felker wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 10:02:55PM +0100, a...@arndb.de wrote:
> > Rich Felker hat am 11. Februar 2015 um 21:12 geschrieben:
> > > On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 08:50:06PM +0100, a...@arndb.de wrote:
> > > > > > At least for AArch64 ILP32 we ar
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 09:12:34AM +0100, Szabolcs Nagy wrote:
> * Szabolcs Nagy [2015-02-11 20:05:37 +0100]:
> > (i think this is also a problem if userspace code uses syscall(2) directly,
> > libc cannot possibly know where to signextend and the kernel side does not
> > do the fixup right now)
>
* Szabolcs Nagy [2015-02-11 20:05:37 +0100]:
>
> (i think this is also a problem if userspace code uses syscall(2) directly,
> libc cannot possibly know where to signextend and the kernel side does not
> do the fixup right now)
>
nobody picked up this issue, is this resolved?
ie. if userspace
On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 10:02:55PM +0100, a...@arndb.de wrote:
> Rich Felker hat am 11. Februar 2015 um 21:12 geschrieben:
> > On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 08:50:06PM +0100, a...@arndb.de wrote:
> > > > > At least for AArch64 ILP32 we are still free to change the user/kernel
> > > > > ABI, so we could
Sorry about the HTML mail, I'm currently travelling without access to my regular
mail client.
> "a...@arndb.de" hat am 11. Februar 2015 um 22:02 geschrieben:
>
> Rich Felker hat am 11. Februar 2015 um 21:12 geschrieben:
> > On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 08:50:06PM +0100, a...@arndb.de wrote:
> >
On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 08:50:06PM +0100, a...@arndb.de wrote:
> > > At least for AArch64 ILP32 we are still free to change the user/kernel
> > > ABI, so we could add wrappers for the affected syscalls to fix this up.
> > >
> >
> > yes, afaik on x32 the 64bit kernel expects 64bit layout,
> > arm64
> Szabolcs Nagy hat am 11. Februar 2015 um 20:05 geschrieben:
> * Catalin Marinas [2015-02-11 17:39:19 +]:
> > (adding Marcus)
> >
> > On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 06:13:02PM +, Rich Felker wrote:
> > > I don't know if this has been discussed on libc-alpha yet or not, but
> > > I think we need
On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 11:05 AM, Szabolcs Nagy wrote:
> i know at least one android kernel issue: there is an ioctl for the
> alarm device that takes timespec argument
>
> (i think it's not in the mainline kernel and i guess android does
> not care about x32 so it was not an issue so far, but thi
* Catalin Marinas [2015-02-11 17:39:19 +]:
> (adding Marcus)
>
> On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 06:13:02PM +, Rich Felker wrote:
> > I don't know if this has been discussed on libc-alpha yet or not, but
> > I think we need to open a discussion of how it relates to open glibc
> > bug #16437, whic
11 matches
Mail list logo
