On 12/7/2016 9:36 AM, David Miller wrote:
[...]
What does the newer tool do on an older kernel if it doesn't see
the fields? Does it check the size of the structure given back
to it, and conditionally handle the older vs. the newer layout?
It must do this.
Right but the rds-tool doesn't
On 12/7/2016 9:36 AM, David Miller wrote:
[...]
What does the newer tool do on an older kernel if it doesn't see
the fields? Does it check the size of the structure given back
to it, and conditionally handle the older vs. the newer layout?
It must do this.
Right but the rds-tool doesn't
From: Santosh Shilimkar
Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2016 09:20:17 -0800
> Newer/Updated tools which can parse this extra info in needs newer
> or an updated kernel which supports and populates these fields.
>
> As mentioned, this particular option used only in verbose mode so
From: Santosh Shilimkar
Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2016 09:20:17 -0800
> Newer/Updated tools which can parse this extra info in needs newer
> or an updated kernel which supports and populates these fields.
>
> As mentioned, this particular option used only in verbose mode so
> am ok to drop this change
On 12/7/2016 9:05 AM, David Miller wrote:
From: Santosh Shilimkar
Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2016 08:44:04 -0800
On 12/7/2016 7:55 AM, David Miller wrote:
From: Santosh Shilimkar
Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2016 20:01:56 -0800
What level of
On 12/7/2016 9:05 AM, David Miller wrote:
From: Santosh Shilimkar
Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2016 08:44:04 -0800
On 12/7/2016 7:55 AM, David Miller wrote:
From: Santosh Shilimkar
Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2016 20:01:56 -0800
What level of compatability exists here? If we run an old tool on a
new
kernel, or
From: Santosh Shilimkar
Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2016 08:44:04 -0800
> On 12/7/2016 7:55 AM, David Miller wrote:
>> From: Santosh Shilimkar
>> Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2016 20:01:56 -0800
>>
>> What level of compatability exists here? If we run an
From: Santosh Shilimkar
Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2016 08:44:04 -0800
> On 12/7/2016 7:55 AM, David Miller wrote:
>> From: Santosh Shilimkar
>> Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2016 20:01:56 -0800
>>
>> What level of compatability exists here? If we run an old tool on a
>> new
>> kernel, or a new tool on an old
On 12/7/2016 7:55 AM, David Miller wrote:
From: Santosh Shilimkar
Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2016 20:01:56 -0800
rds-tools already support it.
Signed-off-by: Santosh Shilimkar
---
include/uapi/linux/rds.h | 1 +
net/rds/ib.c |
On 12/7/2016 7:55 AM, David Miller wrote:
From: Santosh Shilimkar
Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2016 20:01:56 -0800
rds-tools already support it.
Signed-off-by: Santosh Shilimkar
---
include/uapi/linux/rds.h | 1 +
net/rds/ib.c | 1 +
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git
From: Santosh Shilimkar
Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2016 20:01:56 -0800
> rds-tools already support it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Santosh Shilimkar
> ---
> include/uapi/linux/rds.h | 1 +
> net/rds/ib.c | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 2
From: Santosh Shilimkar
Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2016 20:01:56 -0800
> rds-tools already support it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Santosh Shilimkar
> ---
> include/uapi/linux/rds.h | 1 +
> net/rds/ib.c | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/rds.h
rds-tools already support it.
Signed-off-by: Santosh Shilimkar
---
include/uapi/linux/rds.h | 1 +
net/rds/ib.c | 1 +
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/rds.h b/include/uapi/linux/rds.h
index 3833113..410ae3c 100644
---
rds-tools already support it.
Signed-off-by: Santosh Shilimkar
---
include/uapi/linux/rds.h | 1 +
net/rds/ib.c | 1 +
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/rds.h b/include/uapi/linux/rds.h
index 3833113..410ae3c 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/rds.h
+++
14 matches
Mail list logo