On 10/30/2015 4:15 AM, David Miller wrote:
From: Santosh Shilimkar
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2015 15:51:12 -0700
+ >rs_bound_node, ht_parms)) {
*port = rs->rs_bound_port;
ret = 0;
From: Santosh Shilimkar
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2015 15:51:12 -0700
> + >rs_bound_node, ht_parms)) {
> *port = rs->rs_bound_port;
> ret = 0;
> rdsdebug("rs %p binding to %pI4:%d\n",
>
From: Santosh Shilimkar
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2015 15:51:12 -0700
> + >rs_bound_node, ht_parms)) {
> *port = rs->rs_bound_port;
> ret = 0;
> rdsdebug("rs %p binding
On 10/30/2015 4:15 AM, David Miller wrote:
From: Santosh Shilimkar
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2015 15:51:12 -0700
+ >rs_bound_node, ht_parms)) {
*port = rs->rs_bound_port;
ret = 0;
To further improve the RDS connection scalabilty on massive systems
where number of sockets grows into tens of thousands of sockets, there
is a need of larger bind hashtable. Pre-allocated 8K or 16K table is
not very flexible in terms of memory utilisation. The rhashtable
infrastructure gives us
To further improve the RDS connection scalabilty on massive systems
where number of sockets grows into tens of thousands of sockets, there
is a need of larger bind hashtable. Pre-allocated 8K or 16K table is
not very flexible in terms of memory utilisation. The rhashtable
infrastructure gives us
6 matches
Mail list logo