On Monday, December 03, 2012 08:01:11 AM Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Mon, 03 Dec 2012 14:45:46 +0800
>
> Jason Wang wrote:
> > On Tuesday, November 27, 2012 08:49:19 AM Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > > On Tue, 27 Nov 2012 14:45:13 +0800
> > >
> > > Jason Wang wrote:
> > > > On 11/27/2012 01:37
On Monday, December 03, 2012 08:01:11 AM Stephen Hemminger wrote:
On Mon, 03 Dec 2012 14:45:46 +0800
Jason Wang jasow...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tuesday, November 27, 2012 08:49:19 AM Stephen Hemminger wrote:
On Tue, 27 Nov 2012 14:45:13 +0800
Jason Wang jasow...@redhat.com wrote:
On Monday, December 03, 2012 08:01:11 AM Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Mon, 03 Dec 2012 14:45:46 +0800
>
> Jason Wang wrote:
> > On Tuesday, November 27, 2012 08:49:19 AM Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > > On Tue, 27 Nov 2012 14:45:13 +0800
> > >
> > > Jason Wang wrote:
> > > > On 11/27/2012 01:37
On Monday, December 03, 2012 08:01:11 AM Stephen Hemminger wrote:
On Mon, 03 Dec 2012 14:45:46 +0800
Jason Wang jasow...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tuesday, November 27, 2012 08:49:19 AM Stephen Hemminger wrote:
On Tue, 27 Nov 2012 14:45:13 +0800
Jason Wang jasow...@redhat.com wrote:
On Mon, 03 Dec 2012 14:45:46 +0800
Jason Wang wrote:
> On Tuesday, November 27, 2012 08:49:19 AM Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > On Tue, 27 Nov 2012 14:45:13 +0800
> >
> > Jason Wang wrote:
> > > On 11/27/2012 01:37 AM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > > > On Mon, 26 Nov 2012 15:56:52 +0800
> > > >
On Mon, 03 Dec 2012 14:45:46 +0800
Jason Wang jasow...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tuesday, November 27, 2012 08:49:19 AM Stephen Hemminger wrote:
On Tue, 27 Nov 2012 14:45:13 +0800
Jason Wang jasow...@redhat.com wrote:
On 11/27/2012 01:37 AM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
On Mon, 26 Nov 2012
On Tuesday, November 27, 2012 08:49:19 AM Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Nov 2012 14:45:13 +0800
>
> Jason Wang wrote:
> > On 11/27/2012 01:37 AM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > > On Mon, 26 Nov 2012 15:56:52 +0800
> > >
> > > Jason Wang wrote:
> > >> Some deivces do not free the old tx
On Tuesday, November 27, 2012 08:49:19 AM Stephen Hemminger wrote:
On Tue, 27 Nov 2012 14:45:13 +0800
Jason Wang jasow...@redhat.com wrote:
On 11/27/2012 01:37 AM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
On Mon, 26 Nov 2012 15:56:52 +0800
Jason Wang jasow...@redhat.com wrote:
Some deivces do
On Thu, 29 Nov 2012 13:30:13 +0200
"Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 06:13:13PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > On Wednesday, November 28, 2012 08:53:05 AM Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > > On Wed, 28 Nov 2012 14:48:52 +0800
> > >
> > > Jason Wang wrote:
> > > > On 11/28/2012
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 06:13:13PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> On Wednesday, November 28, 2012 08:53:05 AM Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > On Wed, 28 Nov 2012 14:48:52 +0800
> >
> > Jason Wang wrote:
> > > On 11/28/2012 12:49 AM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 27 Nov 2012 14:45:13 +0800
>
On Wednesday, November 28, 2012 08:53:05 AM Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Nov 2012 14:48:52 +0800
>
> Jason Wang wrote:
> > On 11/28/2012 12:49 AM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > > On Tue, 27 Nov 2012 14:45:13 +0800
> > >
> > > Jason Wang wrote:
> > >> On 11/27/2012 01:37 AM, Stephen
On Wednesday, November 28, 2012 08:53:05 AM Stephen Hemminger wrote:
On Wed, 28 Nov 2012 14:48:52 +0800
Jason Wang jasow...@redhat.com wrote:
On 11/28/2012 12:49 AM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
On Tue, 27 Nov 2012 14:45:13 +0800
Jason Wang jasow...@redhat.com wrote:
On 11/27/2012
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 06:13:13PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
On Wednesday, November 28, 2012 08:53:05 AM Stephen Hemminger wrote:
On Wed, 28 Nov 2012 14:48:52 +0800
Jason Wang jasow...@redhat.com wrote:
On 11/28/2012 12:49 AM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
On Tue, 27 Nov 2012 14:45:13
On Thu, 29 Nov 2012 13:30:13 +0200
Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 06:13:13PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
On Wednesday, November 28, 2012 08:53:05 AM Stephen Hemminger wrote:
On Wed, 28 Nov 2012 14:48:52 +0800
Jason Wang jasow...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, 28 Nov 2012 14:48:52 +0800
Jason Wang wrote:
> On 11/28/2012 12:49 AM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > On Tue, 27 Nov 2012 14:45:13 +0800
> > Jason Wang wrote:
> >
> >> On 11/27/2012 01:37 AM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> >>> On Mon, 26 Nov 2012 15:56:52 +0800
> >>> Jason Wang wrote:
> >>>
On Wed, 28 Nov 2012 14:48:52 +0800
Jason Wang jasow...@redhat.com wrote:
On 11/28/2012 12:49 AM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
On Tue, 27 Nov 2012 14:45:13 +0800
Jason Wang jasow...@redhat.com wrote:
On 11/27/2012 01:37 AM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
On Mon, 26 Nov 2012 15:56:52 +0800
Jason
On 11/28/2012 12:49 AM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
On Tue, 27 Nov 2012 14:45:13 +0800
Jason Wang wrote:
On 11/27/2012 01:37 AM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
On Mon, 26 Nov 2012 15:56:52 +0800
Jason Wang wrote:
Some deivces do not free the old tx skbs immediately after it has been sent
(usually
On Tue, 27 Nov 2012 14:45:13 +0800
Jason Wang wrote:
> On 11/27/2012 01:37 AM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > On Mon, 26 Nov 2012 15:56:52 +0800
> > Jason Wang wrote:
> >
> >> Some deivces do not free the old tx skbs immediately after it has been sent
> >> (usually in tx interrupt). One such
On Tue, 27 Nov 2012 14:45:13 +0800
Jason Wang jasow...@redhat.com wrote:
On 11/27/2012 01:37 AM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
On Mon, 26 Nov 2012 15:56:52 +0800
Jason Wang jasow...@redhat.com wrote:
Some deivces do not free the old tx skbs immediately after it has been sent
(usually in tx
On 11/28/2012 12:49 AM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
On Tue, 27 Nov 2012 14:45:13 +0800
Jason Wang jasow...@redhat.com wrote:
On 11/27/2012 01:37 AM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
On Mon, 26 Nov 2012 15:56:52 +0800
Jason Wang jasow...@redhat.com wrote:
Some deivces do not free the old tx skbs
On 11/27/2012 01:37 AM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
On Mon, 26 Nov 2012 15:56:52 +0800
Jason Wang wrote:
Some deivces do not free the old tx skbs immediately after it has been sent
(usually in tx interrupt). One such example is virtio-net which optimizes for
virt and only free the possible old
On Mon, 26 Nov 2012 15:56:52 +0800
Jason Wang wrote:
> Some deivces do not free the old tx skbs immediately after it has been sent
> (usually in tx interrupt). One such example is virtio-net which optimizes for
> virt and only free the possible old tx skbs during the next packet sending.
> This
On Mon, 26 Nov 2012 15:56:52 +0800
Jason Wang jasow...@redhat.com wrote:
Some deivces do not free the old tx skbs immediately after it has been sent
(usually in tx interrupt). One such example is virtio-net which optimizes for
virt and only free the possible old tx skbs during the next packet
On 11/27/2012 01:37 AM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
On Mon, 26 Nov 2012 15:56:52 +0800
Jason Wang jasow...@redhat.com wrote:
Some deivces do not free the old tx skbs immediately after it has been sent
(usually in tx interrupt). One such example is virtio-net which optimizes for
virt and only free
24 matches
Mail list logo