Re: [net-next RFC] pktgen: don't wait for the device who doesn't free skb immediately after sent

2013-01-27 Thread Jason Wang
On Monday, December 03, 2012 08:01:11 AM Stephen Hemminger wrote: > On Mon, 03 Dec 2012 14:45:46 +0800 > > Jason Wang wrote: > > On Tuesday, November 27, 2012 08:49:19 AM Stephen Hemminger wrote: > > > On Tue, 27 Nov 2012 14:45:13 +0800 > > > > > > Jason Wang wrote: > > > > On 11/27/2012 01:37

Re: [net-next RFC] pktgen: don't wait for the device who doesn't free skb immediately after sent

2013-01-27 Thread Jason Wang
On Monday, December 03, 2012 08:01:11 AM Stephen Hemminger wrote: On Mon, 03 Dec 2012 14:45:46 +0800 Jason Wang jasow...@redhat.com wrote: On Tuesday, November 27, 2012 08:49:19 AM Stephen Hemminger wrote: On Tue, 27 Nov 2012 14:45:13 +0800 Jason Wang jasow...@redhat.com wrote:

Re: [net-next RFC] pktgen: don't wait for the device who doesn't free skb immediately after sent

2012-12-04 Thread Jason Wang
On Monday, December 03, 2012 08:01:11 AM Stephen Hemminger wrote: > On Mon, 03 Dec 2012 14:45:46 +0800 > > Jason Wang wrote: > > On Tuesday, November 27, 2012 08:49:19 AM Stephen Hemminger wrote: > > > On Tue, 27 Nov 2012 14:45:13 +0800 > > > > > > Jason Wang wrote: > > > > On 11/27/2012 01:37

Re: [net-next RFC] pktgen: don't wait for the device who doesn't free skb immediately after sent

2012-12-04 Thread Jason Wang
On Monday, December 03, 2012 08:01:11 AM Stephen Hemminger wrote: On Mon, 03 Dec 2012 14:45:46 +0800 Jason Wang jasow...@redhat.com wrote: On Tuesday, November 27, 2012 08:49:19 AM Stephen Hemminger wrote: On Tue, 27 Nov 2012 14:45:13 +0800 Jason Wang jasow...@redhat.com wrote:

Re: [net-next RFC] pktgen: don't wait for the device who doesn't free skb immediately after sent

2012-12-03 Thread Stephen Hemminger
On Mon, 03 Dec 2012 14:45:46 +0800 Jason Wang wrote: > On Tuesday, November 27, 2012 08:49:19 AM Stephen Hemminger wrote: > > On Tue, 27 Nov 2012 14:45:13 +0800 > > > > Jason Wang wrote: > > > On 11/27/2012 01:37 AM, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > > > > On Mon, 26 Nov 2012 15:56:52 +0800 > > > >

Re: [net-next RFC] pktgen: don't wait for the device who doesn't free skb immediately after sent

2012-12-03 Thread Stephen Hemminger
On Mon, 03 Dec 2012 14:45:46 +0800 Jason Wang jasow...@redhat.com wrote: On Tuesday, November 27, 2012 08:49:19 AM Stephen Hemminger wrote: On Tue, 27 Nov 2012 14:45:13 +0800 Jason Wang jasow...@redhat.com wrote: On 11/27/2012 01:37 AM, Stephen Hemminger wrote: On Mon, 26 Nov 2012

Re: [net-next RFC] pktgen: don't wait for the device who doesn't free skb immediately after sent

2012-12-02 Thread Jason Wang
On Tuesday, November 27, 2012 08:49:19 AM Stephen Hemminger wrote: > On Tue, 27 Nov 2012 14:45:13 +0800 > > Jason Wang wrote: > > On 11/27/2012 01:37 AM, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > > > On Mon, 26 Nov 2012 15:56:52 +0800 > > > > > > Jason Wang wrote: > > >> Some deivces do not free the old tx

Re: [net-next RFC] pktgen: don't wait for the device who doesn't free skb immediately after sent

2012-12-02 Thread Jason Wang
On Tuesday, November 27, 2012 08:49:19 AM Stephen Hemminger wrote: On Tue, 27 Nov 2012 14:45:13 +0800 Jason Wang jasow...@redhat.com wrote: On 11/27/2012 01:37 AM, Stephen Hemminger wrote: On Mon, 26 Nov 2012 15:56:52 +0800 Jason Wang jasow...@redhat.com wrote: Some deivces do

Re: [net-next RFC] pktgen: don't wait for the device who doesn't free skb immediately after sent

2012-11-29 Thread Stephen Hemminger
On Thu, 29 Nov 2012 13:30:13 +0200 "Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote: > On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 06:13:13PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > > On Wednesday, November 28, 2012 08:53:05 AM Stephen Hemminger wrote: > > > On Wed, 28 Nov 2012 14:48:52 +0800 > > > > > > Jason Wang wrote: > > > > On 11/28/2012

Re: [net-next RFC] pktgen: don't wait for the device who doesn't free skb immediately after sent

2012-11-29 Thread Michael S. Tsirkin
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 06:13:13PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > On Wednesday, November 28, 2012 08:53:05 AM Stephen Hemminger wrote: > > On Wed, 28 Nov 2012 14:48:52 +0800 > > > > Jason Wang wrote: > > > On 11/28/2012 12:49 AM, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > > > > On Tue, 27 Nov 2012 14:45:13 +0800 >

Re: [net-next RFC] pktgen: don't wait for the device who doesn't free skb immediately after sent

2012-11-29 Thread Jason Wang
On Wednesday, November 28, 2012 08:53:05 AM Stephen Hemminger wrote: > On Wed, 28 Nov 2012 14:48:52 +0800 > > Jason Wang wrote: > > On 11/28/2012 12:49 AM, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > > > On Tue, 27 Nov 2012 14:45:13 +0800 > > > > > > Jason Wang wrote: > > >> On 11/27/2012 01:37 AM, Stephen

Re: [net-next RFC] pktgen: don't wait for the device who doesn't free skb immediately after sent

2012-11-29 Thread Jason Wang
On Wednesday, November 28, 2012 08:53:05 AM Stephen Hemminger wrote: On Wed, 28 Nov 2012 14:48:52 +0800 Jason Wang jasow...@redhat.com wrote: On 11/28/2012 12:49 AM, Stephen Hemminger wrote: On Tue, 27 Nov 2012 14:45:13 +0800 Jason Wang jasow...@redhat.com wrote: On 11/27/2012

Re: [net-next RFC] pktgen: don't wait for the device who doesn't free skb immediately after sent

2012-11-29 Thread Michael S. Tsirkin
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 06:13:13PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: On Wednesday, November 28, 2012 08:53:05 AM Stephen Hemminger wrote: On Wed, 28 Nov 2012 14:48:52 +0800 Jason Wang jasow...@redhat.com wrote: On 11/28/2012 12:49 AM, Stephen Hemminger wrote: On Tue, 27 Nov 2012 14:45:13

Re: [net-next RFC] pktgen: don't wait for the device who doesn't free skb immediately after sent

2012-11-29 Thread Stephen Hemminger
On Thu, 29 Nov 2012 13:30:13 +0200 Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com wrote: On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 06:13:13PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: On Wednesday, November 28, 2012 08:53:05 AM Stephen Hemminger wrote: On Wed, 28 Nov 2012 14:48:52 +0800 Jason Wang jasow...@redhat.com wrote:

Re: [net-next RFC] pktgen: don't wait for the device who doesn't free skb immediately after sent

2012-11-28 Thread Stephen Hemminger
On Wed, 28 Nov 2012 14:48:52 +0800 Jason Wang wrote: > On 11/28/2012 12:49 AM, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > > On Tue, 27 Nov 2012 14:45:13 +0800 > > Jason Wang wrote: > > > >> On 11/27/2012 01:37 AM, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > >>> On Mon, 26 Nov 2012 15:56:52 +0800 > >>> Jason Wang wrote: > >>>

Re: [net-next RFC] pktgen: don't wait for the device who doesn't free skb immediately after sent

2012-11-28 Thread Stephen Hemminger
On Wed, 28 Nov 2012 14:48:52 +0800 Jason Wang jasow...@redhat.com wrote: On 11/28/2012 12:49 AM, Stephen Hemminger wrote: On Tue, 27 Nov 2012 14:45:13 +0800 Jason Wang jasow...@redhat.com wrote: On 11/27/2012 01:37 AM, Stephen Hemminger wrote: On Mon, 26 Nov 2012 15:56:52 +0800 Jason

Re: [net-next RFC] pktgen: don't wait for the device who doesn't free skb immediately after sent

2012-11-27 Thread Jason Wang
On 11/28/2012 12:49 AM, Stephen Hemminger wrote: On Tue, 27 Nov 2012 14:45:13 +0800 Jason Wang wrote: On 11/27/2012 01:37 AM, Stephen Hemminger wrote: On Mon, 26 Nov 2012 15:56:52 +0800 Jason Wang wrote: Some deivces do not free the old tx skbs immediately after it has been sent (usually

Re: [net-next RFC] pktgen: don't wait for the device who doesn't free skb immediately after sent

2012-11-27 Thread Stephen Hemminger
On Tue, 27 Nov 2012 14:45:13 +0800 Jason Wang wrote: > On 11/27/2012 01:37 AM, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > > On Mon, 26 Nov 2012 15:56:52 +0800 > > Jason Wang wrote: > > > >> Some deivces do not free the old tx skbs immediately after it has been sent > >> (usually in tx interrupt). One such

Re: [net-next RFC] pktgen: don't wait for the device who doesn't free skb immediately after sent

2012-11-27 Thread Stephen Hemminger
On Tue, 27 Nov 2012 14:45:13 +0800 Jason Wang jasow...@redhat.com wrote: On 11/27/2012 01:37 AM, Stephen Hemminger wrote: On Mon, 26 Nov 2012 15:56:52 +0800 Jason Wang jasow...@redhat.com wrote: Some deivces do not free the old tx skbs immediately after it has been sent (usually in tx

Re: [net-next RFC] pktgen: don't wait for the device who doesn't free skb immediately after sent

2012-11-27 Thread Jason Wang
On 11/28/2012 12:49 AM, Stephen Hemminger wrote: On Tue, 27 Nov 2012 14:45:13 +0800 Jason Wang jasow...@redhat.com wrote: On 11/27/2012 01:37 AM, Stephen Hemminger wrote: On Mon, 26 Nov 2012 15:56:52 +0800 Jason Wang jasow...@redhat.com wrote: Some deivces do not free the old tx skbs

Re: [net-next RFC] pktgen: don't wait for the device who doesn't free skb immediately after sent

2012-11-26 Thread Jason Wang
On 11/27/2012 01:37 AM, Stephen Hemminger wrote: On Mon, 26 Nov 2012 15:56:52 +0800 Jason Wang wrote: Some deivces do not free the old tx skbs immediately after it has been sent (usually in tx interrupt). One such example is virtio-net which optimizes for virt and only free the possible old

Re: [net-next RFC] pktgen: don't wait for the device who doesn't free skb immediately after sent

2012-11-26 Thread Stephen Hemminger
On Mon, 26 Nov 2012 15:56:52 +0800 Jason Wang wrote: > Some deivces do not free the old tx skbs immediately after it has been sent > (usually in tx interrupt). One such example is virtio-net which optimizes for > virt and only free the possible old tx skbs during the next packet sending. > This

Re: [net-next RFC] pktgen: don't wait for the device who doesn't free skb immediately after sent

2012-11-26 Thread Stephen Hemminger
On Mon, 26 Nov 2012 15:56:52 +0800 Jason Wang jasow...@redhat.com wrote: Some deivces do not free the old tx skbs immediately after it has been sent (usually in tx interrupt). One such example is virtio-net which optimizes for virt and only free the possible old tx skbs during the next packet

Re: [net-next RFC] pktgen: don't wait for the device who doesn't free skb immediately after sent

2012-11-26 Thread Jason Wang
On 11/27/2012 01:37 AM, Stephen Hemminger wrote: On Mon, 26 Nov 2012 15:56:52 +0800 Jason Wang jasow...@redhat.com wrote: Some deivces do not free the old tx skbs immediately after it has been sent (usually in tx interrupt). One such example is virtio-net which optimizes for virt and only free