Re: [next-20130227] kernel NULL pointer dereference [ watchdog | perf related ? ]

2013-02-27 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 8:24 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote: > On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 4:07 PM, Tejun Heo wrote: >> Replying here too just in case. >> >> On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 02:08:40PM +0100, Sedat Dilek wrote: >>> >> static inline void *idr_find(struct idr *idr, int id) >>> >> { >>> >> struct

Re: [next-20130227] kernel NULL pointer dereference [ watchdog | perf related ? ]

2013-02-27 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 4:07 PM, Tejun Heo wrote: > Replying here too just in case. > > On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 02:08:40PM +0100, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> >> static inline void *idr_find(struct idr *idr, int id) >> >> { >> >> struct idr_layer *hint = rcu_dereference_raw(idr->hint); >> >>

Re: [next-20130227] kernel NULL pointer dereference [ watchdog | perf related ? ]

2013-02-27 Thread Borislav Petkov
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 05:14:04PM +0100, Sedat Dilek wrote: > I am not screaming or whining... people should reflect a bit on the > patch workflow process? Also, I am sure a patchwork-service especially > for -next is helpful. Ok, now this formulation reads much nicer. So if you really think this

Re: [next-20130227] kernel NULL pointer dereference [ watchdog | perf related ? ]

2013-02-27 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 5:08 PM, Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 04:56:27PM +0100, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> Hmm, I am not very amused to read all this, really. >> >> If such fixes are around why aren't they applied quickly? > > Sedat, you need to relax a little. You're testing a linu

Re: [next-20130227] kernel NULL pointer dereference [ watchdog | perf related ? ]

2013-02-27 Thread Borislav Petkov
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 04:56:27PM +0100, Sedat Dilek wrote: > Hmm, I am not very amused to read all this, really. > > If such fixes are around why aren't they applied quickly? Sedat, you need to relax a little. You're testing a linux next tree right during the merge window where patches are flyi

Re: [next-20130227] kernel NULL pointer dereference [ watchdog | perf related ? ]

2013-02-27 Thread Tejun Heo
Replying here too just in case. On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 02:08:40PM +0100, Sedat Dilek wrote: > >> static inline void *idr_find(struct idr *idr, int id) > >> { > >> struct idr_layer *hint = rcu_dereference_raw(idr->hint); > >> 86d7: 48 8b 05 00 00 00 00mov0x0(%rip),%rax

Re: [next-20130227] kernel NULL pointer dereference [ watchdog | perf related ? ]

2013-02-27 Thread Wim Van Sebroeck
Hi Sedat, > I have reported this issue several times (first for next-20130223) to > LKML and Linux-Next MLs but got no answer. > I am unsure which is the root cause for all this trouble. > > Can someone have a look at this, please? > > [0.065787] smpboot: CPU0: Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-2467M CPU