Re: [oops] apm and tulip (eeprom.c) related in kernel 2.4.0 test11-pre7

On Sat, 18 Nov 2000, David Ford wrote: > I've been trying [unsuccessfully :S] to get the kernel's pcmcia > working. I woke up this morning and found the following oops: This has nothing to do with the pcmcia support, but with the tulip driver. The easiest thing to try is to comment away the

Re: [oops] apm and tulip (eeprom.c) related in kernel 2.4.0 test11-pre7

On Sat, 18 Nov 2000, David Ford wrote: I've been trying [unsuccessfully :S] to get the kernel's pcmcia working. I woke up this morning and found the following oops: This has nothing to do with the pcmcia support, but with the tulip driver. The easiest thing to try is to comment away the

[oops] apm and tulip (eeprom.c) related in kernel 2.4.0 test11-pre7

I've been trying [unsuccessfully :S] to get the kernel's pcmcia working. I woke up this morning and found the following oops: Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 001b c01d4dca *pde = Oops: CPU:0 EIP:0010:[] Using defaults from ksymoops

[oops] apm and tulip (eeprom.c) related in kernel 2.4.0 test11-pre7

I've been trying [unsuccessfully :S] to get the kernel's pcmcia working. I woke up this morning and found the following oops: Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 001b c01d4dca *pde = Oops: CPU:0 EIP:0010:[c01d4dca] Using defaults from