> De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la part de Ingo Molnar
> Envoyé : 26 septembre 2007 07:14
>
> By popular demand, here is release -v22 of the CFS scheduler.
> It is a full backport of the latest & greatest
> sched-devel.git code to v2.6.23-rc8, v2.6.22.8, v2.6.21.7 and
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la part de Ingo Molnar
Envoyé : 26 septembre 2007 07:14
By popular demand, here is release -v22 of the CFS scheduler.
It is a full backport of the latest greatest
sched-devel.git code to v2.6.23-rc8, v2.6.22.8, v2.6.21.7 and
El Sun, 30 Sep 2007 17:26:22 +0200
Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
>
>
> hm. There are no similar reports so far. Could you try to run the wine
> program from a VGA text console (first do 'xhost +' in an xterm under X
> and then 'export DISPLAY=:0' in the text console) and see
> Try setting features to 14. That helps my similar issues.
Hi Bill,
thanks, but unfortunately that didn't help,
with 2.6.23-rc8 it's already set to 29,
it happens with 2.6.23-rc8 & with the new scheduler
what I found out so far:
it definitely is using 3D acceleration:
glxgears -info
Try setting features to 14. That helps my similar issues.
Hi Bill,
thanks, but unfortunately that didn't help,
with 2.6.23-rc8 it's already set to 29,
it happens with 2.6.23-rc8 with the new scheduler
what I found out so far:
it definitely is using 3D acceleration:
glxgears -info
El Sun, 30 Sep 2007 17:26:22 +0200
Ingo Molnar [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió:
hm. There are no similar reports so far. Could you try to run the wine
program from a VGA text console (first do 'xhost +' in an xterm under X
and then 'export DISPLAY=:0' in the text console) and see whether
Matthew wrote:
Hi Ingo & everbody on the list,
first of all: many thanks for developing this great scheduler (also:
kudos to Con Kolivas for having developed SD & CK-patchset)
(this is my second mail to this list and I hope I'm doing everything right)
I'm doing some backup during work right
* Matthew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks for your answer (sorry, I didn't know your email had changed)
>
> well, this will take some time since I don't work every day & it's
> turned off most of the time, hope that is OK
>
> before I proceed with that data-collection:
>
> do you think
Thanks for your answer (sorry, I didn't know your email had changed)
well, this will take some time since I don't work every day & it's
turned off most of the time, hope that is OK
before I proceed with that data-collection:
do you think it is possible that it might be related to "Fair group
* Matthew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> both cpus have a continous load of ~ 70% right now so I'll be starting
> up 9 instances of glxgears, below are some output & details of my
> system (cpu frequency switching is disabled since it doesn't work
> right now with the current bios version)
>
>
* Alejandro Riveira Fernández <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Even if CFS v20.5 worked well for you, please try this release too, with
> > a good focus on interactivity testing - because, unless some major
> > showstopper is found, this codebase is intended for a v2.6.24 upstream
> > merge.
>
* Alejandro Riveira Fernández [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Even if CFS v20.5 worked well for you, please try this release too, with
a good focus on interactivity testing - because, unless some major
showstopper is found, this codebase is intended for a v2.6.24 upstream
merge.
( Even
* Matthew [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
both cpus have a continous load of ~ 70% right now so I'll be starting
up 9 instances of glxgears, below are some output details of my
system (cpu frequency switching is disabled since it doesn't work
right now with the current bios version)
short
Thanks for your answer (sorry, I didn't know your email had changed)
well, this will take some time since I don't work every day it's
turned off most of the time, hope that is OK
before I proceed with that data-collection:
do you think it is possible that it might be related to Fair group
CPU
* Matthew [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for your answer (sorry, I didn't know your email had changed)
well, this will take some time since I don't work every day it's
turned off most of the time, hope that is OK
before I proceed with that data-collection:
do you think it is
Matthew wrote:
Hi Ingo everbody on the list,
first of all: many thanks for developing this great scheduler (also:
kudos to Con Kolivas for having developed SD CK-patchset)
(this is my second mail to this list and I hope I'm doing everything right)
I'm doing some backup during work right
El Fri, 28 Sep 2007 23:20:13 -0300
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
> On Fri, 28 Sep 2007, Alejandro Riveira Fernández wrote:
> > I feel it better than 20.5 but the later is more stable. Let me explain.
> >
> > I patched a 2.6.22.9 kernel with both versions 22 and
Hi Ingo & everbody on the list,
first of all: many thanks for developing this great scheduler (also:
kudos to Con Kolivas for having developed SD & CK-patchset)
(this is my second mail to this list and I hope I'm doing everything right)
I'm doing some backup during work right now: rsyncing my
Hi Ingo everbody on the list,
first of all: many thanks for developing this great scheduler (also:
kudos to Con Kolivas for having developed SD CK-patchset)
(this is my second mail to this list and I hope I'm doing everything right)
I'm doing some backup during work right now: rsyncing my
El Fri, 28 Sep 2007 23:20:13 -0300
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió:
On Fri, 28 Sep 2007, Alejandro Riveira Fernández wrote:
I feel it better than 20.5 but the later is more stable. Let me explain.
I patched a 2.6.22.9 kernel with both versions 22 and 20.5[1]. With
On Fri, 28 Sep 2007, Alejandro Riveira Fernández wrote:
> I feel it better than 20.5 but the later is more stable. Let me explain.
>
> I patched a 2.6.22.9 kernel with both versions 22 and 20.5[1]. With the 22
> version if i lock the screen (run screensaver) or i try to run a wine program
> i
El Wed, 26 Sep 2007 13:13:57 +0200
Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
> By popular demand, here is release -v22 of the CFS scheduler. It is a
> full backport of the latest & greatest sched-devel.git code to
> v2.6.23-rc8, v2.6.22.8, v2.6.21.7 and v2.6.20.20. The patches can be
>
El Wed, 26 Sep 2007 13:13:57 +0200
Ingo Molnar [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió:
By popular demand, here is release -v22 of the CFS scheduler. It is a
full backport of the latest greatest sched-devel.git code to
v2.6.23-rc8, v2.6.22.8, v2.6.21.7 and v2.6.20.20. The patches can be
downloaded
On Fri, 28 Sep 2007, Alejandro Riveira Fernández wrote:
I feel it better than 20.5 but the later is more stable. Let me explain.
I patched a 2.6.22.9 kernel with both versions 22 and 20.5[1]. With the 22
version if i lock the screen (run screensaver) or i try to run a wine program
i
* S.Çağlar Onur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Compilation [against 2.6.20.20] fails with
>
> buildfarm linux-2.6.20 # make
> CHK include/linux/version.h
> CHK include/linux/utsrelease.h
> CHK include/linux/compile.h
> CC kernel/sched.o
> In file included from
26 Eyl 2007 Çar tarihinde, Ingo Molnar şunları yazmıştı:
> By popular demand, here is release -v22 of the CFS scheduler. It is a
> full backport of the latest & greatest sched-devel.git code to
> v2.6.23-rc8, v2.6.22.8, v2.6.21.7 and v2.6.20.20. The patches can be
> downloaded from the usual
By popular demand, here is release -v22 of the CFS scheduler. It is a
full backport of the latest & greatest sched-devel.git code to
v2.6.23-rc8, v2.6.22.8, v2.6.21.7 and v2.6.20.20. The patches can be
downloaded from the usual place:
http://people.redhat.com/mingo/cfs-scheduler/
This is
By popular demand, here is release -v22 of the CFS scheduler. It is a
full backport of the latest greatest sched-devel.git code to
v2.6.23-rc8, v2.6.22.8, v2.6.21.7 and v2.6.20.20. The patches can be
downloaded from the usual place:
http://people.redhat.com/mingo/cfs-scheduler/
This is
26 Eyl 2007 Çar tarihinde, Ingo Molnar şunları yazmıştı:
By popular demand, here is release -v22 of the CFS scheduler. It is a
full backport of the latest greatest sched-devel.git code to
v2.6.23-rc8, v2.6.22.8, v2.6.21.7 and v2.6.20.20. The patches can be
downloaded from the usual place:
* S.Çağlar Onur [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Compilation [against 2.6.20.20] fails with
buildfarm linux-2.6.20 # make
CHK include/linux/version.h
CHK include/linux/utsrelease.h
CHK include/linux/compile.h
CC kernel/sched.o
In file included from kernel/sched.c:850:
30 matches
Mail list logo
