On Thursday 06 December 2007, Jean Delvare wrote:
> Also, I don't quite see what
> is supposed to make compatibility with the legacy drivers easier, nor
> how, not why it matters in the first place.
There's a clear either/or disjunction. No fuzzy/confusing middle ground.
> > +static int
Hi David,
On Wed, 5 Dec 2007 19:03:12 -0800, David Brownell wrote:
> On Friday 30 November 2007, David Brownell wrote:
> > Thanks for the review. I'll snip out typos and similar trivial
> > comments (and fix them!), using responses here for more the
> > substantive feedback.
>
> Here's the
Hi David,
On Wed, 5 Dec 2007 19:03:12 -0800, David Brownell wrote:
On Friday 30 November 2007, David Brownell wrote:
Thanks for the review. I'll snip out typos and similar trivial
comments (and fix them!), using responses here for more the
substantive feedback.
Here's the current
On Thursday 06 December 2007, Jean Delvare wrote:
Also, I don't quite see what
is supposed to make compatibility with the legacy drivers easier, nor
how, not why it matters in the first place.
There's a clear either/or disjunction. No fuzzy/confusing middle ground.
+static int
On Friday 30 November 2007, David Brownell wrote:
> Thanks for the review. I'll snip out typos and similar trivial
> comments (and fix them!), using responses here for more the
> substantive feedback.
Here's the current version of this patch ... updated to put the
driver into drivers/gpio
On Friday 30 November 2007, David Brownell wrote:
Thanks for the review. I'll snip out typos and similar trivial
comments (and fix them!), using responses here for more the
substantive feedback.
Here's the current version of this patch ... updated to put the
driver into drivers/gpio (separate
6 matches
Mail list logo
