Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v9

2007-05-08 Thread Ingo Molnar
* William Lee Irwin III <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > You also seem to be unaware of the work done by Nick Piggin in > > nicksched. There are a lot of mutually incompatible approaches being > > evaluated, and that's good for the future. > > I'd like to add in Mike Kravetz, Hubertus Franke, an

Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v9

2007-05-07 Thread William Lee Irwin III
On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 10:03:46AM -0400, Bill Davidsen wrote: > Clearly you have no idea what's going on, or how development is done. > These are mutually exclusive different ideas on what constitutes an > optimal scheduler, and not in any way improvements on the same thing, > but total replace

Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v9

2007-05-07 Thread Bill Davidsen
Daniel Phillips wrote: Hi Ingo, I just thought I would mention this, because it is certainly on my mind. I can't help wondering if other folks are also concerned about this. The thing is, why don't you just send your patches to Con who got this whole ball rolling and did a bunch of great work,

Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v9

2007-05-07 Thread Mike Snitzer
On 5/7/07, Daniel Phillips <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi Ingo, I just thought I would mention this, because it is certainly on my mind. I can't help wondering if other folks are also concerned about this. The thing is, why don't you just send your patches to Con who got this whole ball rolling

Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v9

2007-05-07 Thread Mike Galbraith
On Mon, 2007-05-07 at 03:02 -0700, Daniel Phillips wrote: > Hi Ingo, > > I just thought I would mention this, because it is certainly on my > mind. I can't help > wondering if other folks are also concerned about this. The thing is, > why don't you > just send your patches to Con who got this wh

Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v9

2007-05-07 Thread Daniel Phillips
Hi Ingo, I just thought I would mention this, because it is certainly on my mind. I can't help wondering if other folks are also concerned about this. The thing is, why don't you just send your patches to Con who got this whole ball rolling and did a bunch of great work, proving beyond any reas

Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v9

2007-05-07 Thread Nicolas Mailhot
Ingo Molnar elte.hu> writes: > i'm pleased to announce release -v9 of the CFS scheduler patchset. (The > main goal of CFS is to implement "desktop scheduling" with as high > quality as technically possible.) Now that Andrew decided to kick scheduler patches out of -mm, can we have for-mm cfs a

[patch] CFS scheduler, -v9

2007-05-03 Thread Ingo Molnar
i'm pleased to announce release -v9 of the CFS scheduler patchset. (The main goal of CFS is to implement "desktop scheduling" with as high quality as technically possible.) The CFS patch against v2.6.21.1 (or against v2.6.20.10) can be downloaded from the usual place: http://people.redhat