On Tue, 2007-06-26 at 11:46 +0100, Richard Hughes wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-06-26 at 11:02 +0100, Richard Purdie wrote:
> > There were some other opinions voiced including one from the person
> > who started this discussion.
> >
> > So no, the people who write the tools that parse sysfs (like HAL.)
>
On Tue, 2007-06-26 at 11:02 +0100, Richard Purdie wrote:
> There were some other opinions voiced including one from the person
> who started this discussion.
>
> So no, the people who write the tools that parse sysfs (like HAL.)
> don't appreciate this.
>
> People who write tools that parse sysfs
On Sun, 2007-06-24 at 22:06 -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 09, 2007 at 10:25:16AM +0100, Richard Purdie wrote:
> > Anyhow, time to stop pretending I have any choice in this ;-). I will
> > have the LED class use random numbers for busids and add a name
> > attribute unless anyone else voices a
On Sat, Jun 09, 2007 at 10:25:16AM +0100, Richard Purdie wrote:
> Anyhow, time to stop pretending I have any choice in this ;-). I will
> have the LED class use random numbers for busids and add a name
> attribute unless anyone else voices an opinion.
Thank you, I really appreciate it, and so does
Hi Richard!
On Sun, 10 Jun 2007, Richard Hughes wrote:
> On Sun, 2007-06-10 at 12:11 +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > Can we keep the original naming? spitz:disk is as unique as led02, and
> > it is _way_ easier to use.
> > Come on, I want to use the led subsystem from the scripts...
>
> I don't
On Sun, 2007-06-10 at 12:11 +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Can we keep the original naming? spitz:disk is as unique as led02, and
> it is _way_ easier to use.
> Come on, I want to use the led subsystem from the scripts...
I don't see a problem with spitz_disk, which is just as easy to use in
script
Hi!
> > My other concerns with this patch are that it exports incorrect
> > information on spitz (which I had warned about and I will get bug
> > reports about) and that "description" is not really a suitable name for
> > a sysfs attribute, "function" might give a better idea of what it
> > repres
On Fri, 2007-06-08 at 16:46 -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 09, 2007 at 12:02:28AM +0100, Richard Purdie wrote:
> > On Fri, 2007-06-08 at 11:57 -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jun 01, 2007 at 05:23:24PM +0100, Richard Purdie wrote:
> > > Why not just do a simple:
> > > led01
> > > led0
On Sat, Jun 09, 2007 at 12:02:28AM +0100, Richard Purdie wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-06-08 at 11:57 -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 01, 2007 at 05:23:24PM +0100, Richard Purdie wrote:
> > > I still question whether either colour or function properties are
> > > actually particularly useful to users
On Fri, 2007-06-08 at 11:57 -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 01, 2007 at 05:23:24PM +0100, Richard Purdie wrote:
> > I still question whether either colour or function properties are
> > actually particularly useful to userspace other than for naming purposes
> > which is why they were part of t
On Fri, Jun 01, 2007 at 05:23:24PM +0100, Richard Purdie wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-06-01 at 16:59 +0100, Richard Hughes wrote:
> > On Fri, 2007-06-01 at 16:43 +0100, Richard Purdie wrote:
> > > I accept this is basically out of my hands now. Greg/Kay have the
> > > appropriate emails and if they'll let
On Fri, 2007-06-01 at 16:59 +0100, Richard Hughes wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-06-01 at 16:43 +0100, Richard Purdie wrote:
> > I accept this is basically out of my hands now. Greg/Kay have the
> > appropriate emails and if they'll let me know which approach they want
> > to take, I'll apply an appropriate
On Fri, 2007-06-01 at 16:43 +0100, Richard Purdie wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-06-01 at 16:04 +0100, Richard Hughes wrote:
> > Patch attached corrects all the brokenness with the led class (encoding
> > some attributes in the device handle).
>
> For the benefit of LKML, there has been some discussion of
On Fri, 2007-06-01 at 16:04 +0100, Richard Hughes wrote:
> Patch attached corrects all the brokenness with the led class (encoding
> some attributes in the device handle).
For the benefit of LKML, there has been some discussion of this
elsewhere. My arguments do not particularly come across in Ric
On Thu, 2007-05-31 at 00:24 -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, May 30, 2007 at 05:19:31PM +0100, Richard Purdie wrote:
> > On Wed, 2007-05-30 at 16:34 +0100, Richard Hughes wrote:
> > > I've talked with other kernel guys here at red hat and they don't think
> > > putting properties in the handle is a
15 matches
Mail list logo
