On 07/07/2015 05:43 AM, Mike Galbraith wrote:
On Tue, 2015-07-07 at 06:01 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:
On Mon, 2015-07-06 at 15:41 -0400, Josef Bacik wrote:
So the NO_WAKE_WIDE_IDLE results are very good, almost the same as the
baseline with a slight regression at lower RPS and a slight
On Tue, 2015-07-07 at 09:40 -0400, Josef Bacik wrote:
> The WAKE_WIDE_IDLE run was basically the same so I'm good with the KISS
> version. I'll run that through the load tests this morning and let you
> know how it goes. I'm still seeing a slight regression at lower RPS,
> but it's like
On 07/07/2015 05:43 AM, Mike Galbraith wrote:
On Tue, 2015-07-07 at 06:01 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:
On Mon, 2015-07-06 at 15:41 -0400, Josef Bacik wrote:
So the NO_WAKE_WIDE_IDLE results are very good, almost the same as the
baseline with a slight regression at lower RPS and a slight
On Tue, 2015-07-07 at 06:01 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> On Mon, 2015-07-06 at 15:41 -0400, Josef Bacik wrote:
>
> > So the NO_WAKE_WIDE_IDLE results are very good, almost the same as the
> > baseline with a slight regression at lower RPS and a slight improvement
> > at high RPS.
>
> Good.
On 07/07/2015 05:43 AM, Mike Galbraith wrote:
On Tue, 2015-07-07 at 06:01 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:
On Mon, 2015-07-06 at 15:41 -0400, Josef Bacik wrote:
So the NO_WAKE_WIDE_IDLE results are very good, almost the same as the
baseline with a slight regression at lower RPS and a slight
On Tue, 2015-07-07 at 09:40 -0400, Josef Bacik wrote:
The WAKE_WIDE_IDLE run was basically the same so I'm good with the KISS
version. I'll run that through the load tests this morning and let you
know how it goes. I'm still seeing a slight regression at lower RPS,
but it's like 1-2%,
On Tue, 2015-07-07 at 06:01 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:
On Mon, 2015-07-06 at 15:41 -0400, Josef Bacik wrote:
So the NO_WAKE_WIDE_IDLE results are very good, almost the same as the
baseline with a slight regression at lower RPS and a slight improvement
at high RPS.
Good. I can
On 07/07/2015 05:43 AM, Mike Galbraith wrote:
On Tue, 2015-07-07 at 06:01 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:
On Mon, 2015-07-06 at 15:41 -0400, Josef Bacik wrote:
So the NO_WAKE_WIDE_IDLE results are very good, almost the same as the
baseline with a slight regression at lower RPS and a slight
8 matches
Mail list logo
