On Monday 28 January 2008, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Jan 2008 02:41:51 -0500 Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > blah, you're right. combo patch here we come.
> > ---
> > Per previous discussions about cleaning up ufs_fs.h, people just want
> > this straight up dropped from users
On Mon, 28 Jan 2008 02:41:51 -0500 Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> blah, you're right. combo patch here we come.
> ---
> Per previous discussions about cleaning up ufs_fs.h, people just want this
> straight up dropped from userspace export. The only remaining consumer (silo)
> has be
On Sat, 26 Jan 2008 04:09:52 -0500 Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Per previous discussions about cleaning up ufs_fs.h, people just want this
> straight up dropped from userspace export. The only remaining consumer (silo)
> has been fixed a while ago to not rely on this header.
>
Th
On Saturday 26 January 2008, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 26, 2008 at 04:09:52AM -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > Per previous discussions about cleaning up ufs_fs.h, people just want
> > this straight up dropped from userspace export. The only remaining
> > consumer (silo) has been fixe
On Sat, Jan 26, 2008 at 04:09:52AM -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> Per previous discussions about cleaning up ufs_fs.h, people just want this
> straight up dropped from userspace export. The only remaining consumer (silo)
> has been fixed a while ago to not rely on this header.
Thanks! Care to mo
Per previous discussions about cleaning up ufs_fs.h, people just want this
straight up dropped from userspace export. The only remaining consumer (silo)
has been fixed a while ago to not rely on this header.
Signed-off-by: Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
include/linux/Kbuild |1 -
i
6 matches
Mail list logo