Bjorn Helgaas <> wrote:
> On Wednesday 13 July 2005 7:09 pm, Matt Tolentino wrote:
>> This patch addresses a problem on x86 EFI systems with larger memory
>> configurations. Up until now, we've relied on the fact that the
>> ACPI RSDT would reside somewhere in low memory that could be
>> permanent
On Wednesday 13 July 2005 7:09 pm, Matt Tolentino wrote:
> This patch addresses a problem on x86 EFI systems with larger memory
> configurations. Up until now, we've relied on the fact that the
> ACPI RSDT would reside somewhere in low memory that could be permanently
> mapped in kernel address
This patch addresses a problem on x86 EFI systems with larger memory
configurations. Up until now, we've relied on the fact that the
ACPI RSDT would reside somewhere in low memory that could be permanently
mapped in kernel address space - so __va() has been sufficient. However,
on EFI systems,
3 matches
Mail list logo