Re: [patch] ia64: remove per_cpu_offset()

On Wed, Nov 07, 2007 at 02:55:24PM +0800, Luming Yu wrote: > NAK for now. > > I'm trying to add lockdep , so please don't delete it until it could > be proved really useless... > Please don't hurry... Ok, in that case I Re-ack your typo fix patch. Sorry for the noise. -- Horms H:

Re: [patch] ia64: remove per_cpu_offset()

On Wed, Nov 07, 2007 at 02:55:24PM +0800, Luming Yu wrote: NAK for now. I'm trying to add lockdep , so please don't delete it until it could be proved really useless... Please don't hurry... Ok, in that case I Re-ack your typo fix patch. Sorry for the noise. -- Horms H:

Re: [patch] ia64: remove per_cpu_offset()

NAK for now. I'm trying to add lockdep , so please don't delete it until it could be proved really useless... Please don't hurry... On 11/7/07, Simon Horman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > per_cpu_offset() was added as part of a lockdep patch, > "[PATCH] lockdep: add per_cpu_offset()" >

[patch] ia64: remove per_cpu_offset()

per_cpu_offset() was added as part of a lockdep patch, "[PATCH] lockdep: add per_cpu_offset()" (a875a69f8b00a38b4f40d9632a4fc71a159f0e0d), but ia64 doesn't have lockdep, nor does it use per_cpu_offset() anywhere else. This came up because Yu Lumming noticed that the ia64 version of

[patch] ia64: remove per_cpu_offset()

per_cpu_offset() was added as part of a lockdep patch, [PATCH] lockdep: add per_cpu_offset() (a875a69f8b00a38b4f40d9632a4fc71a159f0e0d), but ia64 doesn't have lockdep, nor does it use per_cpu_offset() anywhere else. This came up because Yu Lumming noticed that the ia64 version of per_cpu_offset()

Re: [patch] ia64: remove per_cpu_offset()

NAK for now. I'm trying to add lockdep , so please don't delete it until it could be proved really useless... Please don't hurry... On 11/7/07, Simon Horman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: per_cpu_offset() was added as part of a lockdep patch, [PATCH] lockdep: add per_cpu_offset()