Chen, Kenneth W wrote:
> io_submit_one assigns ki_left = ki_nbytes = iocb->aio_nbytes, then
> calls down to aio_setup_iocb, then to aio_setup_single_vector. In there,
> ki_nbytes is reassigned to the same value it got two call stack above it.
> There is no need to do so.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ken
io_submit_one assigns ki_left = ki_nbytes = iocb->aio_nbytes, then
calls down to aio_setup_iocb, then to aio_setup_single_vector. In there,
ki_nbytes is reassigned to the same value it got two call stack above it.
There is no need to do so.
Signed-off-by: Ken Chen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
diff -Nurp
io_submit_one assigns ki_left = ki_nbytes = iocb-aio_nbytes, then
calls down to aio_setup_iocb, then to aio_setup_single_vector. In there,
ki_nbytes is reassigned to the same value it got two call stack above it.
There is no need to do so.
Signed-off-by: Ken Chen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
diff -Nurp
Chen, Kenneth W wrote:
io_submit_one assigns ki_left = ki_nbytes = iocb-aio_nbytes, then
calls down to aio_setup_iocb, then to aio_setup_single_vector. In there,
ki_nbytes is reassigned to the same value it got two call stack above it.
There is no need to do so.
Signed-off-by: Ken Chen
4 matches
Mail list logo