On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 11:15:29PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > > diff --git a/include/acpi/platform/acenv.h b/include/acpi/platform/acenv.h
> > > index e863dd5..5e0fc2b 100644
> > > --- a/include/acpi/platform/acenv.h
> > > +++ b/include/acpi/platform/acenv.h
> >
> > This is an ACPICA header
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 11:15:29PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
diff --git a/include/acpi/platform/acenv.h b/include/acpi/platform/acenv.h
index e863dd5..5e0fc2b 100644
--- a/include/acpi/platform/acenv.h
+++ b/include/acpi/platform/acenv.h
This is an ACPICA header and changes to
Hi,
> From: Dan Carpenter [mailto:dan.carpen...@oracle.com]
> Sent: Thursday, May 01, 2014 4:15 AM
>
> On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 09:49:23PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Wednesday, April 30, 2014 06:08:44 PM Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > > There are sometimes where we know that we are doing an
Hi,
From: Dan Carpenter [mailto:dan.carpen...@oracle.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 01, 2014 4:15 AM
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 09:49:23PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Wednesday, April 30, 2014 06:08:44 PM Dan Carpenter wrote:
There are sometimes where we know that we are doing an strcpy()
Ah. Fantastic. That's all great stuff. I'm on holiday today but I'll
send a new later in the week.
regards,
dan carpenter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
Ah. Fantastic. That's all great stuff. I'm on holiday today but I'll
send a new later in the week.
regards,
dan carpenter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 06:08:44PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> There are sometimes where we know that we are doing an strcpy() into a
> fixed length buffer. In those cases, we could verify that the strcpy()
> doesn't overflow. This patch introduces DEBUG_STRICT_SLOW_STRCPY_CHECKS
> if you want
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 09:49:23PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Wednesday, April 30, 2014 06:08:44 PM Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > There are sometimes where we know that we are doing an strcpy() into a
> > fixed length buffer. In those cases, we could verify that the strcpy()
> > doesn't
On Wednesday, April 30, 2014 06:08:44 PM Dan Carpenter wrote:
> There are sometimes where we know that we are doing an strcpy() into a
> fixed length buffer. In those cases, we could verify that the strcpy()
> doesn't overflow. This patch introduces DEBUG_STRICT_SLOW_STRCPY_CHECKS
> if you want
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 9:19 AM, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 08:33:21AM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 8:08 AM, Dan Carpenter
>> wrote:
>> > +#if CONFIG_DEBUG_STRICT_SLOW_STRCPY_CHECKS
>> > +#define strcpy(dest, src) do {
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 08:33:21AM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 8:08 AM, Dan Carpenter
> wrote:
> > +#if CONFIG_DEBUG_STRICT_SLOW_STRCPY_CHECKS
> > +#define strcpy(dest, src) do { \
> > + int len = __compiletime_size(dest);
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 8:08 AM, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> There are sometimes where we know that we are doing an strcpy() into a
> fixed length buffer. In those cases, we could verify that the strcpy()
> doesn't overflow. This patch introduces DEBUG_STRICT_SLOW_STRCPY_CHECKS
> if you want to
There are sometimes where we know that we are doing an strcpy() into a
fixed length buffer. In those cases, we could verify that the strcpy()
doesn't overflow. This patch introduces DEBUG_STRICT_SLOW_STRCPY_CHECKS
if you want to check for that. The downside is that it makes strcpy
slower.
I
There are sometimes where we know that we are doing an strcpy() into a
fixed length buffer. In those cases, we could verify that the strcpy()
doesn't overflow. This patch introduces DEBUG_STRICT_SLOW_STRCPY_CHECKS
if you want to check for that. The downside is that it makes strcpy
slower.
I
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 8:08 AM, Dan Carpenter dan.carpen...@oracle.com wrote:
There are sometimes where we know that we are doing an strcpy() into a
fixed length buffer. In those cases, we could verify that the strcpy()
doesn't overflow. This patch introduces DEBUG_STRICT_SLOW_STRCPY_CHECKS
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 08:33:21AM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 8:08 AM, Dan Carpenter dan.carpen...@oracle.com
wrote:
+#if CONFIG_DEBUG_STRICT_SLOW_STRCPY_CHECKS
+#define strcpy(dest, src) do { \
+ int len =
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 9:19 AM, Dan Carpenter dan.carpen...@oracle.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 08:33:21AM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 8:08 AM, Dan Carpenter dan.carpen...@oracle.com
wrote:
+#if CONFIG_DEBUG_STRICT_SLOW_STRCPY_CHECKS
+#define strcpy(dest, src) do
On Wednesday, April 30, 2014 06:08:44 PM Dan Carpenter wrote:
There are sometimes where we know that we are doing an strcpy() into a
fixed length buffer. In those cases, we could verify that the strcpy()
doesn't overflow. This patch introduces DEBUG_STRICT_SLOW_STRCPY_CHECKS
if you want to
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 09:49:23PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Wednesday, April 30, 2014 06:08:44 PM Dan Carpenter wrote:
There are sometimes where we know that we are doing an strcpy() into a
fixed length buffer. In those cases, we could verify that the strcpy()
doesn't overflow.
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 06:08:44PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
There are sometimes where we know that we are doing an strcpy() into a
fixed length buffer. In those cases, we could verify that the strcpy()
doesn't overflow. This patch introduces DEBUG_STRICT_SLOW_STRCPY_CHECKS
if you want to
20 matches
Mail list logo
