On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 11:16:04AM +0930, Rusty Russell wrote:
> Dan Carpenter writes:
>
> > We cap "stat.size" at INT_MAX but we don't check for negative values so
> > my static checker complains. At this point, you already have control of
> > the kernel and if you start passing negative values
Dan Carpenter writes:
> We cap "stat.size" at INT_MAX but we don't check for negative values so
> my static checker complains. At this point, you already have control of
> the kernel and if you start passing negative values here then you
> deserve what happens next.
>
> On 64 bit systems the vma
We cap "stat.size" at INT_MAX but we don't check for negative values so
my static checker complains. At this point, you already have control of
the kernel and if you start passing negative values here then you
deserve what happens next.
On 64 bit systems the vmalloc() will definitely fail. On 32
3 matches
Mail list logo
