Re: [patch] net, skbuff: do not prefer skb allocation fails early

2019-01-04 Thread David Miller
From: David Rientjes Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2019 13:01:43 -0800 (PST) > Commit dcda9b04713c ("mm, tree wide: replace __GFP_REPEAT by > __GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL with more useful semantic") replaced __GFP_REPEAT in > alloc_skb_with_frags() with __GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL when the allocation may > directly reclaim.

Re: [patch] net, skbuff: do not prefer skb allocation fails early

2019-01-03 Thread Eric Dumazet
On 01/02/2019 01:01 PM, David Rientjes wrote: > Commit dcda9b04713c ("mm, tree wide: replace __GFP_REPEAT by > __GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL with more useful semantic") replaced __GFP_REPEAT in > alloc_skb_with_frags() with __GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL when the allocation may > directly reclaim. > > The previous

[patch] net, skbuff: do not prefer skb allocation fails early

2019-01-02 Thread David Rientjes
Commit dcda9b04713c ("mm, tree wide: replace __GFP_REPEAT by __GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL with more useful semantic") replaced __GFP_REPEAT in alloc_skb_with_frags() with __GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL when the allocation may directly reclaim. The previous behavior would require reclaim up to 1 << order pages for sk