Re: [patch] oom_kill fix

2005-03-15 Thread Coywolf Qi Hunt
On Mon, 14 Mar 2005 18:02:58 -0800, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Coywolf Qi Hunt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > This oom_kill fix is to do mmput(mm) a bit earlier and returning 0 or 1 > > to indicate success or failure instead of returning mm_struct pointer. > > Why is this a "

Re: [patch] oom_kill fix

2005-03-14 Thread Andrew Morton
Coywolf Qi Hunt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > This oom_kill fix is to do mmput(mm) a bit earlier and returning 0 or 1 > to indicate success or failure instead of returning mm_struct pointer. Why is this a "fix"? What bug is it fixing? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscrib

[patch] oom_kill fix

2005-03-14 Thread Coywolf Qi Hunt
Hello, This oom_kill fix is to do mmput(mm) a bit earlier and returning 0 or 1 to indicate success or failure instead of returning mm_struct pointer. Coywolf Signed-off-by: Coywolf Qi Hunt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> oom_kill.c | 23 +-- 1 files changed, 9 insertions(+)