> I just tried this on an Altix from the test lab, and ia32 bash just
> started.
I don't have any native x86 binaries on my Madison-based testbox, so my
test case was to compile a simple program that counted total length of
argument strings on an x86 box, and copy it to my ia64 box. So that I
wou
On Tue, 2007-05-22 at 16:49 -0700, Luck, Tony wrote:
> > In order to solve this, I added a STACK_TOP_MAX macro for each arch and
> > use that. This made IA64 boot properly.
>
> Yes. Patches apply to 2.6.21 cleanly, build cleanly and boot for me too.
> I can even run:
>
> $ ls -lrt `find /u
On Mon, 2007-05-07 at 10:46 -0700, Luck, Tony wrote:
> > We've tested the following architectures: i386, x86_64, um/i386,
> > parisc, and frv. These are representative of the various scenarios
> > which this patch addresses, but other architecture teams should try it
> > out to make sure there are
On Thursday 10 May 2007 12:06 am, Ollie Wild wrote:
> On 5/9/07, Rob Landley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Just FYI, a really really quick and dirty way of testing this sort of
thing on
> > more architectures and you're likely to physically have?
>
> Does this properly emulate caching? On paris
On 5/9/07, Rob Landley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Just FYI, a really really quick and dirty way of testing this sort of thing on
more architectures and you're likely to physically have?
Does this properly emulate caching? On parisc, cache coherency was
the main issue we ran into. I suspect th
On Wednesday 09 May 2007 4:48 pm, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Sun, 6 May 2007 01:51:34 -0700
> "Ollie Wild" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > A while back, I sent out a preliminary patch
> > (http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ports.hppa/752) to remove the
> > MAX_ARG_PAGES limit on command line siz
On Sun, 6 May 2007 01:51:34 -0700
"Ollie Wild" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> A while back, I sent out a preliminary patch
> (http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ports.hppa/752) to remove the
> MAX_ARG_PAGES limit on command line sizes. Since then, Peter Zijlstra
> and I have fixed a number of bugs
At some point in the past, Ollie Wild wrote:
>> We've tested the following architectures: i386, x86_64, um/i386,
>> parisc, and frv. These are representative of the various scenarios
>> which this patch addresses, but other architecture teams should try it
>> out to make sure there aren't any unex
> We've tested the following architectures: i386, x86_64, um/i386,
> parisc, and frv. These are representative of the various scenarios
> which this patch addresses, but other architecture teams should try it
> out to make sure there aren't any unexpected gotchas.
Doesn't build on ia64: complaint
9 matches
Mail list logo
