Re: [patch] rt,blk,mq: Make blk_mq_cpu_notify_lock a raw spinlock

2014-03-07 Thread Mike Galbraith
On Fri, 2014-03-07 at 17:00 +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > * Mike Galbraith | 2014-03-03 05:57:26 [+0100]: > > > block/blk-mq-cpu.c | 14 +++--- > > This got in v3.13-rc1, are you running some kind of backported version > of this in v3.12 or do you have your own v3.13-rt?

Re: [patch] rt,blk,mq: Make blk_mq_cpu_notify_lock a raw spinlock

2014-03-07 Thread Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
* Mike Galbraith | 2014-03-03 05:57:26 [+0100]: > block/blk-mq-cpu.c | 14 +++--- This got in v3.13-rc1, are you running some kind of backported version of this in v3.12 or do you have your own v3.13-rt? Sebastian -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe

Re: [patch] rt,blk,mq: Make blk_mq_cpu_notify_lock a raw spinlock

2014-03-07 Thread Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
* Mike Galbraith | 2014-03-03 05:57:26 [+0100]: block/blk-mq-cpu.c | 14 +++--- This got in v3.13-rc1, are you running some kind of backported version of this in v3.12 or do you have your own v3.13-rt? Sebastian -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel

Re: [patch] rt,blk,mq: Make blk_mq_cpu_notify_lock a raw spinlock

2014-03-07 Thread Mike Galbraith
On Fri, 2014-03-07 at 17:00 +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: * Mike Galbraith | 2014-03-03 05:57:26 [+0100]: block/blk-mq-cpu.c | 14 +++--- This got in v3.13-rc1, are you running some kind of backported version of this in v3.12 or do you have your own v3.13-rt? It's

Re: [patch] rt,blk,mq: Make blk_mq_cpu_notify_lock a raw spinlock

2014-03-03 Thread Jens Axboe
On 03/02/2014 09:57 PM, Mike Galbraith wrote: [ 365.164040] BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/rtmutex.c:674 [ 365.164041] in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 1, pid: 26, name: migration/1 [ 365.164043] no locks held by migration/1/26. [ 365.164044] irq event stamp:

Re: [patch] rt,blk,mq: Make blk_mq_cpu_notify_lock a raw spinlock

2014-03-03 Thread Jens Axboe
On 03/02/2014 09:57 PM, Mike Galbraith wrote: [ 365.164040] BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/rtmutex.c:674 [ 365.164041] in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 1, pid: 26, name: migration/1 [ 365.164043] no locks held by migration/1/26. [ 365.164044] irq event stamp:

[patch] rt,blk,mq: Make blk_mq_cpu_notify_lock a raw spinlock

2014-03-02 Thread Mike Galbraith
[ 365.164040] BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/rtmutex.c:674 [ 365.164041] in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 1, pid: 26, name: migration/1 [ 365.164043] no locks held by migration/1/26. [ 365.164044] irq event stamp: 6648 [ 365.164056] hardirqs last enabled at

[patch] rt,blk,mq: Make blk_mq_cpu_notify_lock a raw spinlock

2014-03-02 Thread Mike Galbraith
[ 365.164040] BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/rtmutex.c:674 [ 365.164041] in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 1, pid: 26, name: migration/1 [ 365.164043] no locks held by migration/1/26. [ 365.164044] irq event stamp: 6648 [ 365.164056] hardirqs last enabled at