On Thu, 19 Jul 2007 13:25:07 -0700 (PDT)
Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, 19 Jul 2007, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> >
> > A better patch should be the appended. Does that work for you too?
>
> Btw, I already committed this as obvious.
>
> I did the same for the SLAB
On Thu, 19 Jul 2007 13:25:07 -0700 (PDT)
Linus Torvalds [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 19 Jul 2007, Linus Torvalds wrote:
A better patch should be the appended. Does that work for you too?
Btw, I already committed this as obvious.
I did the same for the SLAB __do_kmalloc()
* Fernando Lopez-Lezcano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-07-19 at 21:42 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > Linus, Christoph,
> >
> > recent slub commits in -git cause this bootup crash:
> >
> > Freeing unused kernel memory: 324k freed
> > Write protecting the kernel read-only data:
On Thu, 2007-07-19 at 21:42 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> Linus, Christoph,
>
> recent slub commits in -git cause this bootup crash:
>
> Freeing unused kernel memory: 324k freed
> Write protecting the kernel read-only data: 1294k
Just curious, are the crashes even possible in 2.6.22.1? (I see
On Thu, 2007-07-19 at 21:42 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
Linus, Christoph,
recent slub commits in -git cause this bootup crash:
Freeing unused kernel memory: 324k freed
Write protecting the kernel read-only data: 1294k
Just curious, are the crashes even possible in 2.6.22.1? (I see the
* Fernando Lopez-Lezcano [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 2007-07-19 at 21:42 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
Linus, Christoph,
recent slub commits in -git cause this bootup crash:
Freeing unused kernel memory: 324k freed
Write protecting the kernel read-only data: 1294k
Just
Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, 19 Jul 2007, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> >
> > A better patch should be the appended. Does that work for you too?
>
> Btw, I already committed this as obvious.
>
> I did the same for the SLAB __do_kmalloc() thing. Let's hope that that was
>
On Thu, 19 Jul 2007, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> A better patch should be the appended. Does that work for you too?
Btw, I already committed this as obvious.
I did the same for the SLAB __do_kmalloc() thing. Let's hope that that was
the extent of the damage.
Linus
-
To
* Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 19 Jul 2007, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> > i had to apply the patch below to make the kernel boot again.
>
> A better patch should be the appended. Does that work for you too?
yeah, works fine!
Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Thu, 19 Jul 2007, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> i had to apply the patch below to make the kernel boot again.
A better patch should be the appended. Does that work for you too?
Linus
---
mm/slub.c |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/slub.c
Linus, Christoph,
recent slub commits in -git cause this bootup crash:
Freeing unused kernel memory: 324k freed
Write protecting the kernel read-only data: 1294k
[ cut here ]
kernel BUG at mm/slub.c:2401!
invalid opcode: [#1]
PREEMPT SMP
Modules linked in:
Linus, Christoph,
recent slub commits in -git cause this bootup crash:
Freeing unused kernel memory: 324k freed
Write protecting the kernel read-only data: 1294k
[ cut here ]
kernel BUG at mm/slub.c:2401!
invalid opcode: [#1]
PREEMPT SMP
Modules linked in:
On Thu, 19 Jul 2007, Ingo Molnar wrote:
i had to apply the patch below to make the kernel boot again.
A better patch should be the appended. Does that work for you too?
Linus
---
mm/slub.c |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/slub.c
* Linus Torvalds [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 19 Jul 2007, Ingo Molnar wrote:
i had to apply the patch below to make the kernel boot again.
A better patch should be the appended. Does that work for you too?
yeah, works fine!
Acked-by: Ingo Molnar [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ingo
-
On Thu, 19 Jul 2007, Linus Torvalds wrote:
A better patch should be the appended. Does that work for you too?
Btw, I already committed this as obvious.
I did the same for the SLAB __do_kmalloc() thing. Let's hope that that was
the extent of the damage.
Linus
-
To
Linus Torvalds [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thu, 19 Jul 2007, Linus Torvalds wrote:
A better patch should be the appended. Does that work for you too?
Btw, I already committed this as obvious.
I did the same for the SLAB __do_kmalloc() thing. Let's hope that that was
the extent of
16 matches
Mail list logo