Re: [patch] timer_list should use signed numbers for relative times

On Tue 2007-11-27 15:19:27, Andreas Schwab wrote: > Pavel Machek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Hi! > > > > > >> > Relative times are signed by nature, and timers can (briefly) have > >> > expires in past. Print them as negative numbers. > >> > > >> > Signed-off-by: Pavel Machek <[EMAIL PROTECT

Re: [patch] timer_list should use signed numbers for relative times

Pavel Machek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi! > > >> > Relative times are signed by nature, and timers can (briefly) have >> > expires in past. Print them as negative numbers. >> > >> > Signed-off-by: Pavel Machek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> > >> > diff --git a/kernel/time/timer_list.c b/kernel/time/t

Re: [patch] timer_list should use signed numbers for relative times

Hi! > > Relative times are signed by nature, and timers can (briefly) have > > expires in past. Print them as negative numbers. > > > > Signed-off-by: Pavel Machek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > diff --git a/kernel/time/timer_list.c b/kernel/time/timer_list.c > > index 12c5f4c..7f6eaa9 100644 > > --

Re: [patch] timer_list should use signed numbers for relative times

Pavel Machek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Relative times are signed by nature, and timers can (briefly) have > expires in past. Print them as negative numbers. > > Signed-off-by: Pavel Machek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > diff --git a/kernel/time/timer_list.c b/kernel/time/timer_list.c > index 12c5f4c.

[patch] timer_list should use signed numbers for relative times

Relative times are signed by nature, and timers can (briefly) have expires in past. Print them as negative numbers. Signed-off-by: Pavel Machek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> diff --git a/kernel/time/timer_list.c b/kernel/time/timer_list.c index 12c5f4c..7f6eaa9 100644 --- a/kernel/time/timer_list.c +++ b/k