John Levon wrote:
>
> On Tue, 13 Feb 2001, Tigran Aivazian wrote:
>
> > Hi Alan,
> >
> > The only case in schedule_timeout() which does not call schedule() does
> > set tsk->state = TASK_RUNNING explicitly before returning. Therefore, any
> > code which unconditionally calls schedule_timeout() (
On Tue, 13 Feb 2001, John Levon wrote:
> I had a similar set of patches a while ago. I had several more unnecessary settings.
>
> At least Matthew Dharm as usb-storage maintainer wanted to keep his in. Of more
> concern IMHO were the drivers busy waiting by failing to reset current->state
> on ea
On Tue, 13 Feb 2001, Tigran Aivazian wrote:
> Hi Alan,
>
> The only case in schedule_timeout() which does not call schedule() does
> set tsk->state = TASK_RUNNING explicitly before returning. Therefore, any
> code which unconditionally calls schedule_timeout() (and, of course
> schedule()) does
Hi Alan,
The only case in schedule_timeout() which does not call schedule() does
set tsk->state = TASK_RUNNING explicitly before returning. Therefore, any
code which unconditionally calls schedule_timeout() (and, of course
schedule()) does not need to set TASK_RUNNING afterwards.
I have seen som
4 matches
Mail list logo