Re: [patch 0/3] add perform_write to a_ops

2008-02-04 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Mon, Feb 04, 2008 at 09:52:06PM +0100, Miklos Szeredi wrote: > Moving up to higher layers might not be possible, due to lock/unlock > of i_mutex being inside generic_file_aio_write(). Well some bits can be moved up. Here's my grand plan which I plan to implement once I get some time for it (or

Re: [patch 0/3] add perform_write to a_ops

2008-02-04 Thread Miklos Szeredi
> > a_ops->perform_write() was left out from Nick Piggin's new a_ops > > patchset, as it was non-essential, and postponed for later inclusion. > > > > This short series reintroduces it, but only adds the fuse > > implementation and not simple_perform_write(), which I'm not sure > > would be a sign

Re: [patch 0/3] add perform_write to a_ops

2008-02-04 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Mon, Feb 04, 2008 at 06:04:10PM +0100, Miklos Szeredi wrote: > a_ops->perform_write() was left out from Nick Piggin's new a_ops > patchset, as it was non-essential, and postponed for later inclusion. > > This short series reintroduces it, but only adds the fuse > implementation and not simple_p

[patch 0/3] add perform_write to a_ops

2008-02-04 Thread Miklos Szeredi
a_ops->perform_write() was left out from Nick Piggin's new a_ops patchset, as it was non-essential, and postponed for later inclusion. This short series reintroduces it, but only adds the fuse implementation and not simple_perform_write(), which I'm not sure would be a significant improvement. Th