Nick Piggin wrote:
> Just for fun I also had a shot at merging the headers, as they become a
> lot more similar after this with the removal of the paravirt crud.
Glommer posted a set of patches the other day to implement x86-64
paravirt, which unifies lots of things including spinlocks. But if
Nick Piggin wrote:
Just for fun I also had a shot at merging the headers, as they become a
lot more similar after this with the removal of the paravirt crud.
Glommer posted a set of patches the other day to implement x86-64
paravirt, which unifies lots of things including spinlocks. But if
Hi,
I'd like to propose these patches for the x86 tree for a bit more exposure
and testing. Or at least get some discussion going again.
Just for fun I also had a shot at merging the headers, as they become a
lot more similar after this with the removal of the paravirt crud.
Nick
-
To
Hi,
I'd like to propose these patches for the x86 tree for a bit more exposure
and testing. Or at least get some discussion going again.
Just for fun I also had a shot at merging the headers, as they become a
lot more similar after this with the removal of the paravirt crud.
Nick
-
To
4 matches
Mail list logo
