On Wed, 16 Jul 2014, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 11:16:23PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > >
> > > Maybe it's because of new -rc? Letme check...
> >
> > No, it's because its against an older version of your patches which
> > lack the #ifdef PROC_FS around the show funct
On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 11:16:23PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> >
> > Maybe it's because of new -rc? Letme check...
>
> No, it's because its against an older version of your patches which
> lack the #ifdef PROC_FS around the show function
Crap. Sorry. Thomas, I'm fetching -rc5 now, I sup
On Wed, 16 Jul 2014, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 11:08:39PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > On Tue, 15 Jul 2014, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 06:11:58PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Dear sirs, ping?
> > > >
> > > > Hmm, I w
On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 11:08:39PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Jul 2014, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 06:11:58PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Dear sirs, ping?
> > >
> > > Hmm, I was waiting for a V5, but it seems you just updated that singl
On Tue, 15 Jul 2014, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 06:11:58PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > >
> > > Dear sirs, ping?
> >
> > Hmm, I was waiting for a V5, but it seems you just updated that single
> > patch according to the review. I'll pick it up
>
> Thanks a lot, Thomas!
On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 06:11:58PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> >
> > Dear sirs, ping?
>
> Hmm, I was waiting for a V5, but it seems you just updated that single
> patch according to the review. I'll pick it up
Thanks a lot, Thomas!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
On Tue, 15 Jul 2014, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 11:43:54PM +0400, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 10:54:31PM +0400, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi guys, here is an updated version of c/r support for timerfd files. The
> > > main change
> > > is in h
On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 11:43:54PM +0400, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 10:54:31PM +0400, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
> >
> > Hi guys, here is an updated version of c/r support for timerfd files. The
> > main change
> > is in how @ticks are restored in patch 3 -- I switched to ioctl
On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 10:54:31PM +0400, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
>
> Hi guys, here is an updated version of c/r support for timerfd files. The
> main change
> is in how @ticks are restored in patch 3 -- I switched to ioctl code, which
> is wrapped
> with CONFIG because I still think that while th
On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 10:54:31PM +0400, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
> Hi guys, here is an updated version of c/r support for timerfd files. The
> main change
> is in how @ticks are restored in patch 3 -- I switched to ioctl code, which
> is wrapped
> with CONFIG because I still think that while ther
Hi guys, here is an updated version of c/r support for timerfd files. The main
change
is in how @ticks are restored in patch 3 -- I switched to ioctl code, which is
wrapped
with CONFIG because I still think that while there is only one ioctl designated
solely for c/r needs no need to build it all
11 matches
Mail list logo
