Re: [patch 00/10] mm: thrash detection-based file cache sizing v9

2014-02-14 Thread Johannes Weiner
On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 03:05:41PM +0900, Tetsuo Handa wrote: > Johannes Weiner wrote: > > Thanks for the report. There is already a fix for this in -mm: > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-mm-commits=139180637114625=2 > > > > It was merged on the 7th, so it should show up in -next... any day > > now?

Re: [patch 00/10] mm: thrash detection-based file cache sizing v9

2014-02-14 Thread Johannes Weiner
On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 03:05:41PM +0900, Tetsuo Handa wrote: Johannes Weiner wrote: Thanks for the report. There is already a fix for this in -mm: http://marc.info/?l=linux-mm-commitsm=139180637114625w=2 It was merged on the 7th, so it should show up in -next... any day now? That

Re: [patch 00/10] mm: thrash detection-based file cache sizing v9

2014-02-13 Thread Tetsuo Handa
Johannes Weiner wrote: > Thanks for the report. There is already a fix for this in -mm: > http://marc.info/?l=linux-mm-commits=139180637114625=2 > > It was merged on the 7th, so it should show up in -next... any day > now? That patch solved this bproblem but breaks build instead. ERROR:

Re: [patch 00/10] mm: thrash detection-based file cache sizing v9

2014-02-13 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Andrew, On Thu, 13 Feb 2014 14:24:07 -0800 Andrew Morton wrote: > > On Thu, 13 Feb 2014 17:11:26 -0500 Johannes Weiner wrote: > > > On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 12:21:17PM +0900, Tetsuo Handa wrote: > > > Hello. > > > > > > I got a lockdep warning shown below, and the bad commit seems to be >

Re: [patch 00/10] mm: thrash detection-based file cache sizing v9

2014-02-13 Thread Andrew Morton
On Thu, 13 Feb 2014 17:11:26 -0500 Johannes Weiner wrote: > Hi Tetsuo, > > On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 12:21:17PM +0900, Tetsuo Handa wrote: > > Hello. > > > > I got a lockdep warning shown below, and the bad commit seems to be de055616 > > \"mm: keep page cache radix tree nodes in check\" as of

Re: [patch 00/10] mm: thrash detection-based file cache sizing v9

2014-02-13 Thread Johannes Weiner
Hi Tetsuo, On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 12:21:17PM +0900, Tetsuo Handa wrote: > Hello. > > I got a lockdep warning shown below, and the bad commit seems to be de055616 > \"mm: keep page cache radix tree nodes in check\" as of next-20140212 > on linux-next.git. Thanks for the report. There is

Re: [patch 00/10] mm: thrash detection-based file cache sizing v9

2014-02-13 Thread Johannes Weiner
Hi Tetsuo, On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 12:21:17PM +0900, Tetsuo Handa wrote: Hello. I got a lockdep warning shown below, and the bad commit seems to be de055616 \mm: keep page cache radix tree nodes in check\ as of next-20140212 on linux-next.git. Thanks for the report. There is already a fix

Re: [patch 00/10] mm: thrash detection-based file cache sizing v9

2014-02-13 Thread Andrew Morton
On Thu, 13 Feb 2014 17:11:26 -0500 Johannes Weiner han...@cmpxchg.org wrote: Hi Tetsuo, On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 12:21:17PM +0900, Tetsuo Handa wrote: Hello. I got a lockdep warning shown below, and the bad commit seems to be de055616 \mm: keep page cache radix tree nodes in check\ as

Re: [patch 00/10] mm: thrash detection-based file cache sizing v9

2014-02-13 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Andrew, On Thu, 13 Feb 2014 14:24:07 -0800 Andrew Morton a...@linux-foundation.org wrote: On Thu, 13 Feb 2014 17:11:26 -0500 Johannes Weiner han...@cmpxchg.org wrote: On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 12:21:17PM +0900, Tetsuo Handa wrote: Hello. I got a lockdep warning shown below, and

Re: [patch 00/10] mm: thrash detection-based file cache sizing v9

2014-02-13 Thread Tetsuo Handa
Johannes Weiner wrote: Thanks for the report. There is already a fix for this in -mm: http://marc.info/?l=linux-mm-commitsm=139180637114625w=2 It was merged on the 7th, so it should show up in -next... any day now? That patch solved this bproblem but breaks build instead. ERROR:

Re: [patch 00/10] mm: thrash detection-based file cache sizing v9

2014-02-12 Thread Tetsuo Handa
Hello. I got a lockdep warning shown below, and the bad commit seems to be de055616 \"mm: keep page cache radix tree nodes in check\" as of next-20140212 on linux-next.git. Regards. = [ INFO: possible irq lock inversion dependency detected

Re: [patch 00/10] mm: thrash detection-based file cache sizing v9

2014-02-12 Thread Tetsuo Handa
Hello. I got a lockdep warning shown below, and the bad commit seems to be de055616 \mm: keep page cache radix tree nodes in check\ as of next-20140212 on linux-next.git. Regards. = [ INFO: possible irq lock inversion dependency detected ]

Re: [patch 00/10] mm: thrash detection-based file cache sizing v9

2014-02-04 Thread Johannes Weiner
On Tue, Feb 04, 2014 at 03:14:24PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Mon, 3 Feb 2014 19:53:32 -0500 Johannes Weiner wrote: > > > o Fix vmstat build problems on UP (Fengguang Wu's build bot) > > > > o Clarify why optimistic radix_tree_node->private_list link checking > > is safe without

Re: [patch 00/10] mm: thrash detection-based file cache sizing v9

2014-02-04 Thread Andrew Morton
On Mon, 3 Feb 2014 19:53:32 -0500 Johannes Weiner wrote: > o Fix vmstat build problems on UP (Fengguang Wu's build bot) > > o Clarify why optimistic radix_tree_node->private_list link checking > is safe without holding the list_lru lock (Dave Chinner) > > o Assert locking balance when the

Re: [patch 00/10] mm: thrash detection-based file cache sizing v9

2014-02-04 Thread Andrew Morton
On Mon, 3 Feb 2014 19:53:32 -0500 Johannes Weiner han...@cmpxchg.org wrote: o Fix vmstat build problems on UP (Fengguang Wu's build bot) o Clarify why optimistic radix_tree_node-private_list link checking is safe without holding the list_lru lock (Dave Chinner) o Assert locking balance

Re: [patch 00/10] mm: thrash detection-based file cache sizing v9

2014-02-04 Thread Johannes Weiner
On Tue, Feb 04, 2014 at 03:14:24PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: On Mon, 3 Feb 2014 19:53:32 -0500 Johannes Weiner han...@cmpxchg.org wrote: o Fix vmstat build problems on UP (Fengguang Wu's build bot) o Clarify why optimistic radix_tree_node-private_list link checking is safe without

[patch 00/10] mm: thrash detection-based file cache sizing v9

2014-02-03 Thread Johannes Weiner
Changes in this revision o Fix vmstat build problems on UP (Fengguang Wu's build bot) o Clarify why optimistic radix_tree_node->private_list link checking is safe without holding the list_lru lock (Dave Chinner) o Assert locking balance when the list_lru isolator says it dropped the

[patch 00/10] mm: thrash detection-based file cache sizing v9

2014-02-03 Thread Johannes Weiner
Changes in this revision o Fix vmstat build problems on UP (Fengguang Wu's build bot) o Clarify why optimistic radix_tree_node-private_list link checking is safe without holding the list_lru lock (Dave Chinner) o Assert locking balance when the list_lru isolator says it dropped the