Re: [stable] [patch 00/59] -stable review

2007-02-04 Thread Randy Dunlap
On Sun, 4 Feb 2007 08:36:23 -0500 Dave Jones wrote: > On Sat, Feb 03, 2007 at 10:08:28PM -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote: > > On Fri, 2 Feb 2007 18:59:13 -0800 Chris Wright wrote: > > > > > * Chris Wright ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > > > Responses should be made by Mon Feb 3 02:30 UTC 2007 > >

Re: [stable] [patch 00/59] -stable review

2007-02-04 Thread Dave Jones
On Sat, Feb 03, 2007 at 10:08:28PM -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote: > On Fri, 2 Feb 2007 18:59:13 -0800 Chris Wright wrote: > > > * Chris Wright ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > > Responses should be made by Mon Feb 3 02:30 UTC 2007 > > > > Yes, that's Mon Feb 5 (thanks to those on their toes ;-)

Re: [stable] [patch 00/59] -stable review

2007-02-03 Thread Randy Dunlap
On Fri, 2 Feb 2007 18:59:13 -0800 Chris Wright wrote: > * Chris Wright ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > Responses should be made by Mon Feb 3 02:30 UTC 2007 > > Yes, that's Mon Feb 5 (thanks to those on their toes ;-) > > And the roll-up will be available at: > > > http://www.kernel.org/p

Re: [stable] [patch 00/59] -stable review

2007-02-02 Thread Chris Wright
* Chris Wright ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Responses should be made by Mon Feb 3 02:30 UTC 2007 Yes, that's Mon Feb 5 (thanks to those on their toes ;-) And the roll-up will be available at: http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/chrisw/stable/patch-2.6.19.3-rc1.{gz,bz2} once

[patch 00/59] -stable review

2007-02-02 Thread Chris Wright
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 2.6.19.3 release. There are 59 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let us know. If anyone is a maintainer of the proper subsystem, and wants to add a Si