* Chuck Ebbert ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> What happened to jfs_fix_deadlock.patch?
Dave Kleikamp suggested it was not appropriate for -stable.
thanks,
-chris
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo in
Greg KH wrote:
> After many weeks of backlogs, I've finally flushed out all of the
> pending -stable patches, bringing this series to a whopping 101 patches
> pending for the next 2.6.20.2 release.
>
> If everyone could please take the time to review them and let me know if
> there are any issues
After many weeks of backlogs, I've finally flushed out all of the
pending -stable patches, bringing this series to a whopping 101 patches
pending for the next 2.6.20.2 release.
If everyone could please take the time to review them and let me know if
there are any issues with any of these being app
On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 09:10:35AM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> After many weeks of backlogs, I've finally flushed out all of the
> pending -stable patches, bringing this series to a whopping 101 patches
> pending for the next 2.6.20.2 release.
Oh, forgot to announce, but the whole thing can be found i
4 matches
Mail list logo
