Re: [patch 01/10] e1000e: make E1000E default to the same kconfig setting as E1000

2007-12-14 Thread Bill Fink
On Fri, 14 Dec 2007, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Fri, 14 Dec 2007 15:39:26 -0500 > Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > From: Randy Dunlap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > Make E1000E default to the same kconfig setting as E1000. So people's > > > machiens

Re: [patch 01/10] e1000e: make E1000E default to the same kconfig setting as E1000

2007-12-14 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Fri, Dec 14, 2007 at 06:17:55PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote: > Adrian Bunk wrote: >> On Fri, Dec 14, 2007 at 03:39:26PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote: >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: Randy Dunlap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> ... >>> So I think the breakage that occurs is mitigated by two factors:

Re: [patch 01/10] e1000e: make E1000E default to the same kconfig setting as E1000

2007-12-14 Thread Stephen Hemminger
Andrew Morton wrote: On Fri, 14 Dec 2007 15:39:26 -0500 Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: Randy Dunlap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Make E1000E default to the same kconfig setting as E1000. So people's machiens don't stop working when they use oldconfig.

Re: [patch 01/10] e1000e: make E1000E default to the same kconfig setting as E1000

2007-12-14 Thread Andrew Morton
On Fri, 14 Dec 2007 15:39:26 -0500 Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > From: Randy Dunlap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > Make E1000E default to the same kconfig setting as E1000. So people's > > machiens don't stop working when they use oldconfig. > > > >

Re: [patch 01/10] e1000e: make E1000E default to the same kconfig setting as E1000

2007-12-14 Thread Jeff Garzik
Adrian Bunk wrote: On Fri, Dec 14, 2007 at 03:39:26PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: Randy Dunlap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ... So I think the breakage that occurs is mitigated by two factors: 1) kernel hackers that do their own configs are expected to be able to figure

Re: [patch 01/10] e1000e: make E1000E default to the same kconfig setting as E1000

2007-12-14 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Fri, Dec 14, 2007 at 03:39:26PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> From: Randy Dunlap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >... > So I think the breakage that occurs is mitigated by two factors: > 1) kernel hackers that do their own configs are expected to be able to > figure this stuff. >

Re: [patch 01/10] e1000e: make E1000E default to the same kconfig setting as E1000

2007-12-14 Thread Jeff Garzik
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: Randy Dunlap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Make E1000E default to the same kconfig setting as E1000. So people's machiens don't stop working when they use oldconfig. Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: Auke Kok <[EMAIL

Re: [patch 01/10] e1000e: make E1000E default to the same kconfig setting as E1000

2007-12-14 Thread Jeff Garzik
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: Randy Dunlap [EMAIL PROTECTED] Make E1000E default to the same kconfig setting as E1000. So people's machiens don't stop working when they use oldconfig. Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Jeff Garzik [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Auke Kok [EMAIL

Re: [patch 01/10] e1000e: make E1000E default to the same kconfig setting as E1000

2007-12-14 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Fri, Dec 14, 2007 at 03:39:26PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: Randy Dunlap [EMAIL PROTECTED] ... So I think the breakage that occurs is mitigated by two factors: 1) kernel hackers that do their own configs are expected to be able to figure this stuff. 2) kernel

Re: [patch 01/10] e1000e: make E1000E default to the same kconfig setting as E1000

2007-12-14 Thread Jeff Garzik
Adrian Bunk wrote: On Fri, Dec 14, 2007 at 03:39:26PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: Randy Dunlap [EMAIL PROTECTED] ... So I think the breakage that occurs is mitigated by two factors: 1) kernel hackers that do their own configs are expected to be able to figure

Re: [patch 01/10] e1000e: make E1000E default to the same kconfig setting as E1000

2007-12-14 Thread Andrew Morton
On Fri, 14 Dec 2007 15:39:26 -0500 Jeff Garzik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: Randy Dunlap [EMAIL PROTECTED] Make E1000E default to the same kconfig setting as E1000. So people's machiens don't stop working when they use oldconfig. Signed-off-by: Randy

Re: [patch 01/10] e1000e: make E1000E default to the same kconfig setting as E1000

2007-12-14 Thread Stephen Hemminger
Andrew Morton wrote: On Fri, 14 Dec 2007 15:39:26 -0500 Jeff Garzik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: Randy Dunlap [EMAIL PROTECTED] Make E1000E default to the same kconfig setting as E1000. So people's machiens don't stop working when they use oldconfig.

Re: [patch 01/10] e1000e: make E1000E default to the same kconfig setting as E1000

2007-12-14 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Fri, Dec 14, 2007 at 06:17:55PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote: Adrian Bunk wrote: On Fri, Dec 14, 2007 at 03:39:26PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: Randy Dunlap [EMAIL PROTECTED] ... So I think the breakage that occurs is mitigated by two factors: 1) kernel hackers

Re: [patch 01/10] e1000e: make E1000E default to the same kconfig setting as E1000

2007-12-14 Thread Bill Fink
On Fri, 14 Dec 2007, Andrew Morton wrote: On Fri, 14 Dec 2007 15:39:26 -0500 Jeff Garzik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: Randy Dunlap [EMAIL PROTECTED] Make E1000E default to the same kconfig setting as E1000. So people's machiens don't stop working