On Tue, Nov 27, 2007 at 01:38:02PM -0800, Christoph Lameter wrote:
>...
> Hmmm...
>
> http://www.ohse.de/uwe/articles/gcc-attributes.html
>
> says:
>
> model (MODEL-NAME)
> Found in versions: 2.8-3.4
>...
This site says at the top it used gcc versions up to 3.4, so it
obviously can't find
On Tue, 27 Nov 2007, David Mosberger-Tang wrote:
> Code-size reduction? You must be talking *source* code size
> reduction. Surely the small-data access-method decreases object code
> size.
Yes source code reduction. I just added the attribute back but in such a
way that any arch can add attri
On Tue, 27 Nov 2007, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> Strange. Works fine here.
>
> $ arch/ia64/scripts/toolchain-flags gcc objdump readelf
> -DHAVE_WORKING_TEXT_ALIGN -DHAVE_MODEL_SMALL_ATTRIBUTE
> -DHAVE_SERIALIZE_DIRECTIVE
> $ gcc --version | head -n 1
> gcc (GCC) 4.2.1 (SUSE Linux)
> $ grep ia64_han
On 11/27/07, Christoph Lameter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Nov 2007, David Mosberger-Tang wrote:
>
> > Uniformity for the sake of uniformity? The small data addressing is
> > really elegant and I don't think it should be dropped just for the
> > sake of uniformity.
>
> Uniformity for t
Christoph Lameter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, 27 Nov 2007, Andreas Schwab wrote:
>
>> Christoph Lameter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> > The model(small) attribute is not supported by gcc 4.X.
>>
>> Which gcc 4.X are you talking about?
>
> All. Last gcc that supported this was 3.4.
On Tue, 27 Nov 2007, David Mosberger-Tang wrote:
> Uniformity for the sake of uniformity? The small data addressing is
> really elegant and I don't think it should be dropped just for the
> sake of uniformity.
Uniformity for the sake of code size reduction and easier maintenance.
Yes I think i
On 11/27/07, Christoph Lameter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Nov 2007, David Mosberger-Tang wrote:
>
> > On 11/26/07, Christoph Lameter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > The model(small) attribute is not supported by gcc 4.X. The tests
> > > will always be negative today.
> >
> > What was
On Tue, 27 Nov 2007, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> Christoph Lameter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > The model(small) attribute is not supported by gcc 4.X.
>
> Which gcc 4.X are you talking about?
All. Last gcc that supported this was 3.4.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscri
On Mon, 26 Nov 2007, David Mosberger-Tang wrote:
> On 11/26/07, Christoph Lameter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The model(small) attribute is not supported by gcc 4.X. The tests
> > will always be negative today.
>
> What was the rationale for removing this attribute?
The code is then similar a
Christoph Lameter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The model(small) attribute is not supported by gcc 4.X.
Which gcc 4.X are you talking about?
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
SuSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstraße 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
PGP key fingerprint = 58CA 54
On 11/26/07, Christoph Lameter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The model(small) attribute is not supported by gcc 4.X. The tests
> will always be negative today.
What was the rationale for removing this attribute?
--david
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
The model(small) attribute is not supported by gcc 4.X. The tests
will always be negative today.
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Signed-off-by: Christoph Lameter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
arch/ia64/scripts/check-model.c |1 -
arch/ia64/scripts/toolchain-flags |6 --
inclu
12 matches
Mail list logo
