Re: [patch 05/12] mm: oom_kill: generalize OOM progress waitqueue

On Wed 25-03-15 02:17:09, Johannes Weiner wrote: > It turns out that the mechanism to wait for exiting OOM victims is > less generic than it looks: it won't issue wakeups unless the OOM > killer is disabled. > > The reason this check was added was the thought that, since only the > OOM disabling c

[patch 05/12] mm: oom_kill: generalize OOM progress waitqueue

It turns out that the mechanism to wait for exiting OOM victims is less generic than it looks: it won't issue wakeups unless the OOM killer is disabled. The reason this check was added was the thought that, since only the OOM disabling code would wait on this queue, wakeup operations could be save