* Andi Kleen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> > This makes 32 bit cpa similar to x86_64 and makes it easier for
> > following PAT patches.
>
> Please don't do this -- that would be a nightmare merging with my CPA
> series.
>
> This means adding the _addr() entry
* Andi Kleen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This makes 32 bit cpa similar to x86_64 and makes it easier for
following PAT patches.
Please don't do this -- that would be a nightmare merging with my CPA
series.
This means adding the _addr() entry point is ok
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> This makes 32 bit cpa similar to x86_64 and makes it easier for following PAT
> patches.
Please don't do this -- that would be a nightmare merging with my CPA
series.
This means adding the _addr() entry point is ok (although it should not
be needed on i386 because
This makes 32 bit cpa similar to x86_64 and makes it easier for following PAT
patches.
Signed-off-by: Venkatesh Pallipadi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: Suresh Siddha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Index: linux-2.6.git/arch/x86/mm/pageattr_32.c
This makes 32 bit cpa similar to x86_64 and makes it easier for following PAT
patches.
Signed-off-by: Venkatesh Pallipadi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Signed-off-by: Suresh Siddha [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Index: linux-2.6.git/arch/x86/mm/pageattr_32.c
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This makes 32 bit cpa similar to x86_64 and makes it easier for following PAT
patches.
Please don't do this -- that would be a nightmare merging with my CPA
series.
This means adding the _addr() entry point is ok (although it should not
be needed on i386 because it
6 matches
Mail list logo
