Re: [patch 1/2 -next] dma-buf: double unlock in debugfs code

2013-04-11 Thread Dan Carpenter
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 08:43:05AM +0530, Sumit Semwal wrote: > Hi Dan, > > On Apr 11, 2013 11:54 AM, "Dan Carpenter" wrote: > > > > We unlock here when we failed to take the lock. > Thanks for catching this; I will add it to the for-next queue. > > Could I merge this change with the main patch

Re: [patch 1/2 -next] dma-buf: double unlock in debugfs code

2013-04-11 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 09:23:39AM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote: > We unlock here when we failed to take the lock. > > Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter > --- > This is in linux-next, and I think the debugfs code is only in Sumit's > tree. Yes, it's not in mine, so I can't take this, sorry. Sumit, ple

Re: [kbuild] [patch 1/2 -next] dma-buf: double unlock in debugfs code

2013-04-10 Thread Dan Carpenter
Oops... I mailed that prematurely. There isn't a [patch 2/2]. regards, dan carpenter -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read th

[patch 1/2 -next] dma-buf: double unlock in debugfs code

2013-04-10 Thread Dan Carpenter
We unlock here when we failed to take the lock. Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter --- This is in linux-next, and I think the debugfs code is only in Sumit's tree. diff --git a/drivers/base/dma-buf.c b/drivers/base/dma-buf.c index 466476f..174cd2c 100644 --- a/drivers/base/dma-buf.c +++ b/drivers/base