Re: [patch 1/3] remoteproc: memory leak in rproc_handle_carveout()

2012-09-30 Thread Ohad Ben-Cohen
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 9:01 AM, Dan Carpenter wrote: > We only need to allocate mapping if there is an rproc domain. > > Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter > --- > Static checker stuff. Handle with appropriate caution. Applied, thanks. I'm just changing the subject, because this actually fixes a

Re: [patch 1/3] remoteproc: memory leak in rproc_handle_carveout()

2012-09-30 Thread Ohad Ben-Cohen
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 9:01 AM, Dan Carpenter dan.carpen...@oracle.com wrote: We only need to allocate mapping if there is an rproc domain. Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter dan.carpen...@oracle.com --- Static checker stuff. Handle with appropriate caution. Applied, thanks. I'm just changing

[patch 1/3] remoteproc: memory leak in rproc_handle_carveout()

2012-09-25 Thread Dan Carpenter
We only need to allocate mapping if there is an rproc domain. Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter --- Static checker stuff. Handle with appropriate caution. diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c index b6c6229..f163704 100644 ---

[patch 1/3] remoteproc: memory leak in rproc_handle_carveout()

2012-09-25 Thread Dan Carpenter
We only need to allocate mapping if there is an rproc domain. Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter dan.carpen...@oracle.com --- Static checker stuff. Handle with appropriate caution. diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c index b6c6229..f163704 100644