Re: [patch 12/14] drivers/dmapool: use TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE instead of TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE

2005-03-06 Thread Andrew Morton
Nish Aravamudan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Also, __set_current_state() can be user here: the add_wait_queue() contains > > the necessary barriers. (Grubby, but we do that in quite a few places with > > this particular code sequence (we should have an add_wait_queue() variant > > which doe

Re: [patch 12/14] drivers/dmapool: use TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE instead of TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE

2005-03-06 Thread Nish Aravamudan
On Sun, 6 Mar 2005 19:44:14 -0800, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > use TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE instead of TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE > > > > Signed-off-by: Nishanth Aravamudan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Signed-off-by: Domen Puncer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > --- > > >

Re: [patch 12/14] drivers/dmapool: use TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE instead of TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE

2005-03-06 Thread Andrew Morton
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > use TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE instead of TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE > > Signed-off-by: Nishanth Aravamudan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Signed-off-by: Domen Puncer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > --- > > > kj-domen/drivers/base/dmapool.c |2 +- > 1 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 del

[patch 12/14] drivers/dmapool: use TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE instead of TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE

2005-03-06 Thread domen
use TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE instead of TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE Signed-off-by: Nishanth Aravamudan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Signed-off-by: Domen Puncer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- kj-domen/drivers/base/dmapool.c |2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff -puN drivers/base/dmapool.c~task_u