Re: [patch 14/23] x86 microcode: dont check the size

2006-12-03 Thread Willy Tarreau
On Mon, Dec 04, 2006 at 09:04:03AM +0800, Shaohua Li wrote: > On Sat, 2006-12-02 at 07:44 +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote: > > Shaohua, > > > > this one seems appropriate for 2.4 too. It is OK for you if I merge it ? > Yes, 2.4 and 2.6 use the same driver. It should be fine to merge it. > > Thanks, >

Re: [patch 14/23] x86 microcode: dont check the size

2006-12-03 Thread Shaohua Li
On Sat, 2006-12-02 at 07:44 +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote: > Shaohua, > > this one seems appropriate for 2.4 too. It is OK for you if I merge it ? Yes, 2.4 and 2.6 use the same driver. It should be fine to merge it. Thanks, Shaohua > On Wed, Nov 29, 2006 at 02:00:25PM -0800, Chris Wright wrote: > >

Re: [patch 14/23] x86 microcode: dont check the size

2006-12-02 Thread Bill Davidsen
Willy Tarreau wrote: Shaohua, this one seems appropriate for 2.4 too. It is OK for you if I merge it ? Thanks, Willy On Wed, Nov 29, 2006 at 02:00:25PM -0800, Chris Wright wrote: -stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know. -- From: Shaohua Li <[EM

Re: [patch 14/23] x86 microcode: dont check the size

2006-12-01 Thread Willy Tarreau
Shaohua, this one seems appropriate for 2.4 too. It is OK for you if I merge it ? Thanks, Willy On Wed, Nov 29, 2006 at 02:00:25PM -0800, Chris Wright wrote: > -stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know. > -- > > From: Shaohua Li <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

[patch 14/23] x86 microcode: dont check the size

2006-11-29 Thread Chris Wright
-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know. -- From: Shaohua Li <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> IA32 manual says if micorcode update's size is 0, then the size is default size (2048 bytes). But this doesn't suggest all microcode update's size should be above 2048