Re: [patch 16/23] x86/apic: Sanitize ioapic handling

2015-01-16 Thread Borislav Petkov
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 09:22:34PM -, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > We have proper stubs for the IOAPIC=n case and the setup/enable > function have the required checks inside now. Remove the ifdeffery and > the copy conditionals. > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner Acked-by: Borislav Petkov --

Re: [patch 16/23] x86/apic: Sanitize ioapic handling

2015-01-16 Thread Borislav Petkov
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 09:22:34PM -, Thomas Gleixner wrote: We have proper stubs for the IOAPIC=n case and the setup/enable function have the required checks inside now. Remove the ifdeffery and the copypasted conditionals. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner t...@linutronix.de Acked-by:

[patch 16/23] x86/apic: Sanitize ioapic handling

2015-01-15 Thread Thomas Gleixner
We have proper stubs for the IOAPIC=n case and the setup/enable function have the required checks inside now. Remove the ifdeffery and the copy conditionals. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner --- arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c | 17 +++-- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

[patch 16/23] x86/apic: Sanitize ioapic handling

2015-01-15 Thread Thomas Gleixner
We have proper stubs for the IOAPIC=n case and the setup/enable function have the required checks inside now. Remove the ifdeffery and the copypasted conditionals. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner t...@linutronix.de --- arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c | 17 +++-- 1 file changed, 3