On Monday 15 August 2005 12:15, Russell King wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 15, 2005 at 08:12:54PM +1000, Nick Piggin wrote:
> > Well there is now, and that is we are now using a bit in the 2nd
> > byte as flags. So I had to do away with -ve numbers there entirely.
> > You could achieve a similar thing by u
On Mon, Aug 15, 2005 at 11:15:48AM +0100, Russell King wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 15, 2005 at 08:12:54PM +1000, Nick Piggin wrote:
> > Well there is now, and that is we are now using a bit in the 2nd
> > byte as flags. So I had to do away with -ve numbers there entirely.
> >
> > You could achieve a simi
On Mon, Aug 15, 2005 at 08:12:54PM +1000, Nick Piggin wrote:
> Well there is now, and that is we are now using a bit in the 2nd
> byte as flags. So I had to do away with -ve numbers there entirely.
>
> You could achieve a similar thing by using another bit in that byte
> #define VM_FAULT_FAILED 0x
Russell King wrote:
On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 08:21:45PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
@@ -632,10 +632,11 @@ static inline int page_mapped(struct pag
* Used to decide whether a process gets delivered SIGBUS or
* just gets major/minor fault counters bumped up.
*/
-#define VM_FAULT_OOM (-1)
On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 08:21:45PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> @@ -632,10 +632,11 @@ static inline int page_mapped(struct pag
> * Used to decide whether a process gets delivered SIGBUS or
> * just gets major/minor fault counters bumped up.
> */
> -#define VM_FAULT_OOM (-1)
> -#define VM
From: Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Since with remap_file_pages w/prot we may put PROT_NONE on a single PTE rather
than a VMA, we must handle that inside handle_mm_fault.
This value must be handled in the arch-specific fault handlers, and this
change must be ported to every arch on the world;
6 matches
Mail list logo
