On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 09:22:40PM -, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> We better provide proper functions which implement the required code
> flow in the apic code rather than letting the smpboot code open code
> it. That allows to make more functions static and confines the APIC
> functionality to
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 09:22:40PM -, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
We better provide proper functions which implement the required code
flow in the apic code rather than letting the smpboot code open code
it. That allows to make more functions static and confines the APIC
functionality to apic.c
We better provide proper functions which implement the required code
flow in the apic code rather than letting the smpboot code open code
it. That allows to make more functions static and confines the APIC
functionality to apic.c where it belongs.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner
---
We better provide proper functions which implement the required code
flow in the apic code rather than letting the smpboot code open code
it. That allows to make more functions static and confines the APIC
functionality to apic.c where it belongs.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner t...@linutronix.de
4 matches
Mail list logo