-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
------------------

From: Herbert Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

The recent hashing introduced an off-by-one bug in policy list insertion.
Instead of adding after the last entry with a lesser or equal priority,
we're adding after the successor of that entry.

This patch fixes this and also adds a warning if we detect a duplicate
entry in the policy list.  This should never happen due to this if clause.

Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wright <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
 net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c |   16 +++++-----------
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

--- linux-2.6.19.2.orig/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c
+++ linux-2.6.19.2/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c
@@ -615,19 +615,18 @@ int xfrm_policy_insert(int dir, struct x
        struct xfrm_policy *pol;
        struct xfrm_policy *delpol;
        struct hlist_head *chain;
-       struct hlist_node *entry, *newpos, *last;
+       struct hlist_node *entry, *newpos;
        struct dst_entry *gc_list;
 
        write_lock_bh(&xfrm_policy_lock);
        chain = policy_hash_bysel(&policy->selector, policy->family, dir);
        delpol = NULL;
        newpos = NULL;
-       last = NULL;
        hlist_for_each_entry(pol, entry, chain, bydst) {
-               if (!delpol &&
-                   pol->type == policy->type &&
+               if (pol->type == policy->type &&
                    !selector_cmp(&pol->selector, &policy->selector) &&
-                   xfrm_sec_ctx_match(pol->security, policy->security)) {
+                   xfrm_sec_ctx_match(pol->security, policy->security) &&
+                   !WARN_ON(delpol)) {
                        if (excl) {
                                write_unlock_bh(&xfrm_policy_lock);
                                return -EEXIST;
@@ -636,17 +635,12 @@ int xfrm_policy_insert(int dir, struct x
                        if (policy->priority > pol->priority)
                                continue;
                } else if (policy->priority >= pol->priority) {
-                       last = &pol->bydst;
+                       newpos = &pol->bydst;
                        continue;
                }
-               if (!newpos)
-                       newpos = &pol->bydst;
                if (delpol)
                        break;
-               last = &pol->bydst;
        }
-       if (!newpos)
-               newpos = last;
        if (newpos)
                hlist_add_after(newpos, &policy->bydst);
        else

--
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to