* Vivek Goyal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-09-11 07:14]:
> On Sun, Sep 09, 2007 at 08:52:58PM +0200, Bernhard Walle wrote:
> > * Yinghai Lu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-09-09 19:27]:
> > > >
> > > > +#ifdef CONFIG_KEXEC
> > > ...
> > >
> > > CONFIG_KEXEC or CONFIG_CRASH_DUMP?
> >
> > Good question. The
On Sun, Sep 09, 2007 at 08:52:58PM +0200, Bernhard Walle wrote:
> * Yinghai Lu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-09-09 19:27]:
> > >
> > > +#ifdef CONFIG_KEXEC
> > ...
> >
> > CONFIG_KEXEC or CONFIG_CRASH_DUMP?
>
> Good question. The crashkernel parameter was CONFIG_KEXEC before, and
> I also wondered wh
Bernhard Walle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * Yinghai Lu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-09-09 19:27]:
>> >
>> > +#ifdef CONFIG_KEXEC
>> ...
>>
>> CONFIG_KEXEC or CONFIG_CRASH_DUMP?
>
> Good question. The crashkernel parameter was CONFIG_KEXEC before, and
> I also wondered why, but I didn't change thi
* Yinghai Lu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-09-09 19:27]:
> >
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_KEXEC
> ...
>
> CONFIG_KEXEC or CONFIG_CRASH_DUMP?
Good question. The crashkernel parameter was CONFIG_KEXEC before, and
I also wondered why, but I didn't change this because maybe there's
some reason I don't know.
Vivek
On 9/9/07, Bernhard Walle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This patch removes the crashkernel parsing from
> arch/x86_64/kernel/machine_kexec.c and calls the generic function, introduced
> in
> the last patch, in setup_bootmem_allocator().
>
> This is necessary because the amount of System RAM must be
This patch removes the crashkernel parsing from
arch/x86_64/kernel/machine_kexec.c and calls the generic function, introduced in
the last patch, in setup_bootmem_allocator().
This is necessary because the amount of System RAM must be known in this
function now because of the new syntax.
Signed-o
6 matches
Mail list logo