On Fri, Nov 01, 2013 at 09:18:25AM +0800, Dave Young wrote:
> Great, thank you. BTW, I have managed to test original patch set on a
> Macboot Air of my friend with usb boot, it works ok.
Ok, that's actually a very good news - the apples tend to be special wrt
uefi implementation.
--
On Fri, Nov 01, 2013 at 09:18:25AM +0800, Dave Young wrote:
Great, thank you. BTW, I have managed to test original patch set on a
Macboot Air of my friend with usb boot, it works ok.
Ok, that's actually a very good news - the apples tend to be special wrt
uefi implementation.
--
On 10/31/13 at 11:44am, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> Dear Mr. Young,
>
> On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 10:07:14AM +0800, Dave Young wrote:
> > > But Frankly I'd like to see them in list instead even with only small
> > > fixes
> > > beacuse in this way there might be more people to review it carefully.
>
On 10/31/13 at 11:45am, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 08:07:45PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> > You can use git for your own purposes, still.
>
> git mk-coffee --refill --now
Ccing Jonathan Corbet ;)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel"
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 08:07:45PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> You can use git for your own purposes, still.
git mk-coffee --refill --now
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
Dear Mr. Young,
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 10:07:14AM +0800, Dave Young wrote:
> > But Frankly I'd like to see them in list instead even with only small fixes
> > beacuse in this way there might be more people to review it carefully.
>
> There's another shorcoming for keeping new patches in git is
Dear Mr. Young,
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 10:07:14AM +0800, Dave Young wrote:
But Frankly I'd like to see them in list instead even with only small fixes
beacuse in this way there might be more people to review it carefully.
There's another shorcoming for keeping new patches in git is that
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 08:07:45PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
You can use git for your own purposes, still.
git mk-coffee --refill --now
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe
On 10/31/13 at 11:45am, Borislav Petkov wrote:
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 08:07:45PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
You can use git for your own purposes, still.
git mk-coffee --refill --now
Ccing Jonathan Corbet ;)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the
On 10/31/13 at 11:44am, Borislav Petkov wrote:
Dear Mr. Young,
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 10:07:14AM +0800, Dave Young wrote:
But Frankly I'd like to see them in list instead even with only small
fixes
beacuse in this way there might be more people to review it carefully.
There's
On 10/30/2013 07:07 PM, Dave Young wrote:
> On 10/31/13 at 10:04am, Dave Young wrote:
>> On 10/30/13 at 11:47am, Borislav Petkov wrote:
>>> On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 10:03:49AM +0800, Dave Young wrote:
Will try, but please keep the posted patches in mailing list up-to-date,
>>>
>>> Would you
On 10/31/13 at 10:04am, Dave Young wrote:
> On 10/30/13 at 11:47am, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 10:03:49AM +0800, Dave Young wrote:
> > > Will try, but please keep the posted patches in mailing list up-to-date,
> >
> > Would you like me to send them to you privately?
>
>
On 10/30/13 at 11:47am, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 10:03:49AM +0800, Dave Young wrote:
> > Will try, but please keep the posted patches in mailing list up-to-date,
>
> Would you like me to send them to you privately?
Thanks, do not bother to send me privately I can get it
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 10:03:49AM +0800, Dave Young wrote:
> Will try, but please keep the posted patches in mailing list up-to-date,
Would you like me to send them to you privately?
> I'm an old-fashioned person, do not tend to depend on git.
Really? You should change that - you're missing
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 10:03:49AM +0800, Dave Young wrote:
Will try, but please keep the posted patches in mailing list up-to-date,
Would you like me to send them to you privately?
I'm an old-fashioned person, do not tend to depend on git.
Really? You should change that - you're missing out
On 10/30/13 at 11:47am, Borislav Petkov wrote:
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 10:03:49AM +0800, Dave Young wrote:
Will try, but please keep the posted patches in mailing list up-to-date,
Would you like me to send them to you privately?
Thanks, do not bother to send me privately I can get it from
On 10/31/13 at 10:04am, Dave Young wrote:
On 10/30/13 at 11:47am, Borislav Petkov wrote:
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 10:03:49AM +0800, Dave Young wrote:
Will try, but please keep the posted patches in mailing list up-to-date,
Would you like me to send them to you privately?
Thanks, do
On 10/30/2013 07:07 PM, Dave Young wrote:
On 10/31/13 at 10:04am, Dave Young wrote:
On 10/30/13 at 11:47am, Borislav Petkov wrote:
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 10:03:49AM +0800, Dave Young wrote:
Will try, but please keep the posted patches in mailing list up-to-date,
Would you like me to send
On 10/29/13 at 02:43pm, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 10:32:03AM +0800, Dave Young wrote:
> > I remember I tried your efi branch, but the code is different from
> > what you sent to list, thus I turned to use the mbox patches.
>
> Yeah, please use the #efi branch as I keep
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 10:32:03AM +0800, Dave Young wrote:
> I remember I tried your efi branch, but the code is different from
> what you sent to list, thus I turned to use the mbox patches.
Yeah, please use the #efi branch as I keep refreshing it with the newest
changes. They're hopefully not
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 10:32:03AM +0800, Dave Young wrote:
I remember I tried your efi branch, but the code is different from
what you sent to list, thus I turned to use the mbox patches.
Yeah, please use the #efi branch as I keep refreshing it with the newest
changes. They're hopefully not
On 10/29/13 at 02:43pm, Borislav Petkov wrote:
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 10:32:03AM +0800, Dave Young wrote:
I remember I tried your efi branch, but the code is different from
what you sent to list, thus I turned to use the mbox patches.
Yeah, please use the #efi branch as I keep refreshing
> >
> > 3. Then I merged the 'efi' branch of
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bp/bp.git ontop.
>
> I used the patches from mailbox directly.
> Fixed an conflict and merge them one by one.
I remember I tried your efi branch, but the code is different
from what you sent to list,
On 10/28/13 at 03:58pm, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 07:24:58PM +0800, Dave Young wrote:
> > I use linus tree, git pull Matt's efi-next tree, then apply your 12
> > patches and my patches. I applied your previous 11 patches + the last
> > update patch 12/12, but the last one
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 07:24:58PM +0800, Dave Young wrote:
> I use linus tree, git pull Matt's efi-next tree, then apply your 12
> patches and my patches. I applied your previous 11 patches + the last
> update patch 12/12, but the last one does not apply, I manually shift
> a hunk to make it
On 10/28/13 at 12:20pm, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 06:10:11PM +0800, Dave Young wrote:
> > Sorry, I have not any public git account. Attached the patch I applied
> > with git
>
> Still doesn't work:
>
> $ patch -p1 --dry-run -i
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 06:10:11PM +0800, Dave Young wrote:
> Sorry, I have not any public git account. Attached the patch I applied
> with git
Still doesn't work:
$ patch -p1 --dry-run -i /tmp/02-efi-enter-virtual-mode-cleanup-1.patch.new
checking file arch/x86/platform/efi/efi.c
Hunk #1
On 10/28/13 at 06:10pm, Dave Young wrote:
> On 10/28/13 at 11:04am, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 05:51:17PM +0800, Dave Young wrote:
> > > It does have a warning, but it applied successfully, no idea though:
> > > patches/02-efi-enter-virtual-mode-cleanup.patch
> > >
On 10/28/13 at 11:04am, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 05:51:17PM +0800, Dave Young wrote:
> > It does have a warning, but it applied successfully, no idea though:
> > patches/02-efi-enter-virtual-mode-cleanup.patch
> > Applying: Cleanup efi_enter_virtual_mode function
> >
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 05:51:17PM +0800, Dave Young wrote:
> It does have a warning, but it applied successfully, no idea though:
> patches/02-efi-enter-virtual-mode-cleanup.patch
> Applying: Cleanup efi_enter_virtual_mode function
> /home/dave/git/efi/.git/rebase-apply/patch:42: space before
On 10/28/13 at 05:40pm, Dave Young wrote:
> On 10/28/13 at 10:32am, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 11:47:16AM +0800, dyo...@redhat.com wrote:
> > > Add two small functions:
> > > efi_merge_regions and efi_map_regions, efi_enter_virtual_mode
> > > calls them instead of embedding
On 10/28/13 at 10:32am, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 11:47:16AM +0800, dyo...@redhat.com wrote:
> > Add two small functions:
> > efi_merge_regions and efi_map_regions, efi_enter_virtual_mode
> > calls them instead of embedding two long for loop.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Dave
On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 11:47:16AM +0800, dyo...@redhat.com wrote:
> Add two small functions:
> efi_merge_regions and efi_map_regions, efi_enter_virtual_mode
> calls them instead of embedding two long for loop.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dave Young
> ---
> arch/x86/platform/efi/efi.c | 83
>
On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 11:47:16AM +0800, dyo...@redhat.com wrote:
Add two small functions:
efi_merge_regions and efi_map_regions, efi_enter_virtual_mode
calls them instead of embedding two long for loop.
Signed-off-by: Dave Young dyo...@redhat.com
---
arch/x86/platform/efi/efi.c | 83
On 10/28/13 at 10:32am, Borislav Petkov wrote:
On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 11:47:16AM +0800, dyo...@redhat.com wrote:
Add two small functions:
efi_merge_regions and efi_map_regions, efi_enter_virtual_mode
calls them instead of embedding two long for loop.
Signed-off-by: Dave Young
On 10/28/13 at 05:40pm, Dave Young wrote:
On 10/28/13 at 10:32am, Borislav Petkov wrote:
On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 11:47:16AM +0800, dyo...@redhat.com wrote:
Add two small functions:
efi_merge_regions and efi_map_regions, efi_enter_virtual_mode
calls them instead of embedding two long
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 05:51:17PM +0800, Dave Young wrote:
It does have a warning, but it applied successfully, no idea though:
patches/02-efi-enter-virtual-mode-cleanup.patch
Applying: Cleanup efi_enter_virtual_mode function
/home/dave/git/efi/.git/rebase-apply/patch:42: space before tab in
On 10/28/13 at 11:04am, Borislav Petkov wrote:
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 05:51:17PM +0800, Dave Young wrote:
It does have a warning, but it applied successfully, no idea though:
patches/02-efi-enter-virtual-mode-cleanup.patch
Applying: Cleanup efi_enter_virtual_mode function
On 10/28/13 at 06:10pm, Dave Young wrote:
On 10/28/13 at 11:04am, Borislav Petkov wrote:
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 05:51:17PM +0800, Dave Young wrote:
It does have a warning, but it applied successfully, no idea though:
patches/02-efi-enter-virtual-mode-cleanup.patch
Applying: Cleanup
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 06:10:11PM +0800, Dave Young wrote:
Sorry, I have not any public git account. Attached the patch I applied
with git
Still doesn't work:
$ patch -p1 --dry-run -i /tmp/02-efi-enter-virtual-mode-cleanup-1.patch.new
checking file arch/x86/platform/efi/efi.c
Hunk #1
On 10/28/13 at 12:20pm, Borislav Petkov wrote:
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 06:10:11PM +0800, Dave Young wrote:
Sorry, I have not any public git account. Attached the patch I applied
with git
Still doesn't work:
$ patch -p1 --dry-run -i /tmp/02-efi-enter-virtual-mode-cleanup-1.patch.new
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 07:24:58PM +0800, Dave Young wrote:
I use linus tree, git pull Matt's efi-next tree, then apply your 12
patches and my patches. I applied your previous 11 patches + the last
update patch 12/12, but the last one does not apply, I manually shift
a hunk to make it apply.
On 10/28/13 at 03:58pm, Borislav Petkov wrote:
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 07:24:58PM +0800, Dave Young wrote:
I use linus tree, git pull Matt's efi-next tree, then apply your 12
patches and my patches. I applied your previous 11 patches + the last
update patch 12/12, but the last one does not
3. Then I merged the 'efi' branch of
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bp/bp.git ontop.
I used the patches from mailbox directly.
Fixed an conflict and merge them one by one.
I remember I tried your efi branch, but the code is different
from what you sent to list, thus I
Add two small functions:
efi_merge_regions and efi_map_regions, efi_enter_virtual_mode
calls them instead of embedding two long for loop.
Signed-off-by: Dave Young
---
arch/x86/platform/efi/efi.c | 83 +++-
1 file changed, 52 insertions(+), 31
Add two small functions:
efi_merge_regions and efi_map_regions, efi_enter_virtual_mode
calls them instead of embedding two long for loop.
Signed-off-by: Dave Young dyo...@redhat.com
---
arch/x86/platform/efi/efi.c | 83 +++-
1 file changed, 52
46 matches
Mail list logo
